enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montgomery_v_Lanarkshire...

    Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [2015] UKSC 11 is a Scottish delict, medical negligence and English tort law case on doctors and pharmacists that outlines the rule on the disclosure of risks to satisfy the criteria of an informed consent.

  3. Bolitho v City and Hackney HA - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolitho_v_City_and_Hackney_HA

    Bolitho v. City and Hackney Health Authority [1996] 4 All ER 771 is an important English tort law case, on the standard of care required by medical specialists. It follows the Bolam test for professional negligence, and addresses the interaction with the concept of causation.

  4. Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bolam_v_Friern_Hospital...

    Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957] 1 WLR 582 is an English tort law case that lays down the typical rule for assessing the appropriate standard of reasonable care in negligence cases involving skilled professionals such as doctors. This rule is known as the Bolam test, and states that if a doctor reaches the standard of a ...

  5. Medical malpractice in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_malpractice_in_the...

    Likewise, damage can occur without negligence, for example, when someone dies from a fatal disease. In cases involving suicide, physicians and particularly psychiatrists may be to a different standard than other defendants in a tort claim. In most tort cases, suicide is legally viewed as an act which terminates a chain of causality.

  6. Medical malpractice - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medical_malpractice

    The negligence might arise from errors in diagnosis, treatment, aftercare or health management. An act of medical malpractice usually has three characteristics. Firstly, it must be proven that the treatment has not been consistent with the standard of care , which is the standard medical treatment accepted and recognized by the profession.

  7. Clinical peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinical_peer_review

    Peer review in nursing is the process by which practicing registered nurses systematically access, monitor, and make judgments about the quality of nursing care provided by peers as measured against professional standards of practice. In Nursing, as in other professions, peer review applies professional control to practice, and is used by ...

  8. Breach of duty in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Breach_of_duty_in_English_law

    The court stated that the nurses’ actions were consistent with basic professional standards of practice for medical-surgical nurses in an acute care hospital. They did not have nor were they expected to have specialized psychiatric nursing training and would not be judged as though they did. [2]

  9. Negligence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligence

    Negligence (Lat. negligentia) [1] is a failure to exercise appropriate care expected to be exercised in similar circumstances. [2]Within the scope of tort law, negligence pertains to harm caused by the violation of a duty of care through a negligent act or failure to act.