Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[20] [22] The Supreme Court granted certiorari on June 24, 2024. [23] Whereas the government's petition alleged a violation of the Equal Protection Clause, the plaintiffs filed a separate petition for certiorari, which the court did not grant, which additionally presented the theory that the bill violated the Due Process Clause by denying ...
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed on 24 June 2024 to review the legality of Tennessee's Republican-backed ban on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors, following an appeal by President Biden's administration. The challengers argued the ban violated the U.S. Constitution's 14th Amendment's equal protection and due process clauses.
June 24, 2024: December 9, 2024 Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton: 23-1122: Whether the court of appeals erred as a matter of law in applying rational-basis review to a law burdening adults’ access to protected speech, instead of strict scrutiny as this Court and other circuits have consistently done. July 2, 2024 (January 15, 2025) Garland v ...
June 24, 2024 at 1:12 PM ... right to make private medical decisions for a child. Tennessee families and doctors first sued Tennessee in April 2023 before the Department of Justice intervened in ...
A ruling by the Tennessee Supreme Court this month has dealt a blow to a prominent free speech law in Tennessee, First Amendment experts say. In a unanimous decision, the state Supreme Court ruled ...
In June, the Supreme Court also ruled in favor of federal deportation policies in three consolidated cases on appeal before the Fifth and Ninth circuits, where the courts issued conflicting rulings.
The Supreme Court's three buildings are seated in Nashville, Knoxville, and Jackson, Tennessee. The Court is composed of five members: a chief justice, and four justices. As of September 1, 2023, the chief justice is Holly M. Kirby. [1] Unlike other states, in which the state attorney general is directly elected or appointed by the governor or ...
The ruling also pointed out that the Tennessee Supreme Court limited the definition of “harmful to a minor” to materials lacking "serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value for ...