Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Visual demonstration of the double-angle formula for sine. For the above isosceles triangle with unit sides and angle , the area 1 / 2 × base × height is calculated in two orientations. When upright, the area is .
Illustration of the sum formula. Draw a horizontal line (the x -axis); mark an origin O. Draw a line from O at an angle α {\displaystyle \alpha } above the horizontal line and a second line at an angle β {\displaystyle \beta } above that; the angle between the second line and the x -axis is α + β {\displaystyle \alpha +\beta } .
Visual proof of the Pythagorean identity: for any angle , the point (,) = (, ) lies on the unit circle, which satisfies the equation + =.Thus, + =. In mathematics, an identity is an equality relating one mathematical expression A to another mathematical expression B, such that A and B (which might contain some variables) produce the same value for all values of the variables ...
Each arrow is labeled with the result of an identity, specifically, the result of applying the operator at the arrow's tail to the operator at its head. The blue circle in the middle means curl of curl exists, whereas the other two red circles (dashed) mean that DD and GG do not exist.
This identity is useful to evaluate logarithms on calculators. For instance, most calculators have buttons for ln and for log 10, ... Double series formula
The first definition of the double-dot product is the ... sense ii + jj + kk is the identity: ... can be performed using Rodrigues' rotation formula in the ...
By the periodicity identities we can say if the formula is true for −π < θ ≤ π then it is true for all real θ. Next we prove the identity in the range π / 2 < θ ≤ π. To do this we let t = θ − π / 2 , t will now be in the range 0 < t ≤ π/2. We can then make use of squared versions of some basic shift identities ...
An archetypal double counting proof is for the well known formula for the number () of k-combinations (i.e., subsets of size k) of an n-element set: = (+) ().Here a direct bijective proof is not possible: because the right-hand side of the identity is a fraction, there is no set obviously counted by it (it even takes some thought to see that the denominator always evenly divides the numerator).