Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The multiplicity of a prime which does not divide n may be called 0 or may be considered undefined. Ω(n), the prime omega function, is the number of prime factors of n counted with multiplicity (so it is the sum of all prime factor multiplicities). A prime number has Ω(n) = 1.
84 is a semiperfect number, [1] being thrice a perfect number, and the sum of the sixth pair of twin primes (+). [2] It is the number of four-digit perfect powers in decimal . [ 3 ]
All prime numbers from 31 to 6,469,693,189 for free download. Lists of Primes at the Prime Pages. The Nth Prime Page Nth prime through n=10^12, pi(x) through x=3*10^13, Random primes in same range. Interface to a list of the first 98 million primes (primes less than 2,000,000,000) Weisstein, Eric W. "Prime Number Sequences". MathWorld.
The same prime factor may occur more than once; this example has two copies of the prime factor When a prime occurs multiple times, exponentiation can be used to group together multiple copies of the same prime number: for example, in the second way of writing the product above, 5 2 {\displaystyle 5^{2}} denotes the square or second power of 5 ...
Any Ruth–Aaron pair of square-free integers belongs to both lists with the same sum of prime factors. The intersection also contains pairs that are not square-free, for example (7129199, 7129200) = (7×11 2 ×19×443, 2 4 ×3×5 2 ×13×457).
If p is an irregular prime and p divides the numerator of the Bernoulli number B 2k for 0 < 2k < p − 1, then (p, 2k) is called an irregular pair. In other words, an irregular pair is a bookkeeping device to record, for an irregular prime p , the particular indices of the Bernoulli numbers at which regularity fails.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
The two first subsections, are proofs of the generalized version of Euclid's lemma, namely that: if n divides ab and is coprime with a then it divides b. The original Euclid's lemma follows immediately, since, if n is prime then it divides a or does not divide a in which case it is coprime with a so per the generalized version it divides b.