Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In psychology, a set is a group of expectations that shape experience by making people especially sensitive to specific kinds of information. A perceptual set, also called perceptual expectancy, is a predisposition to perceive things in a certain way. [1] Perceptual sets occur in all the different senses. [2]
Cartesian product of the sets {x,y,z} and {1,2,3}In mathematics, specifically set theory, the Cartesian product of two sets A and B, denoted A × B, is the set of all ordered pairs (a, b) where a is in A and b is in B. [1]
Tarski–Grothendieck set theory (TG, named after mathematicians Alfred Tarski and Alexander Grothendieck) is an axiomatic set theory.It is a non-conservative extension of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory (ZFC) and is distinguished from other axiomatic set theories by the inclusion of Tarski's axiom, which states that for each set there is a "Tarski universe" it belongs to (see below).
Set and setting are factors that can condition the effects of psychoactive substances: "Set" refers to the mental state a person brings to the experience, like thoughts, mood and expectations; "setting" to the physical and social environment. [2] This is especially relevant for psychedelic experiences in either a therapeutic or recreational ...
In set theory, a set is often termed an improper subset of itself. Given such paradoxes, mereology requires an axiomatic formulation. A mereological "system" is a first-order theory (with identity) whose universe of discourse consists of wholes and their respective parts, collectively called objects.
Facet Theory is regarded as a promising metatheory for the behavioral sciences by Clyde Coombs, an eminent psychometrician and pioneer of mathematical psychology, who commented: “It is not uncommon for a behavioral theory to be somewhat ambiguous about its domain. The result is that an experiment usually can be performed which will support it ...
Partitions of a 4-element set ordered by refinement. A partition α of a set X is a refinement of a partition ρ of X—and we say that α is finer than ρ and that ρ is coarser than α—if every element of α is a subset of some element of ρ. Informally, this means that α is a further fragmentation of ρ. In that case, it is written that ...
If any set is postulated to exist, such as in the axiom of infinity, then the axiom of empty set is redundant because it is equal to the subset {}.Furthermore, the existence of a member in the universe of discourse, i.e., ∃x(x=x), is implied in certain formulations [1] of first-order logic, in which case the axiom of empty set follows from the axiom of Δ 0-separation, and is thus redundant.