enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Massachusetts v. Purdue - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_v._Purdue

    Massachusetts v. Purdue is a lawsuit filed on August 14, 2018, suing the Stamford, Connecticut-based company Purdue Pharma LP, which created and manufactures OxyContin, "one of the most widely used and prescribed opioid drugs on the market", and Purdue's owners, the Sacklers [1] accusing them of "widespread fraud and deception in the marketing of opioids, and contributing to the opioid crisis ...

  3. Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melendez-Diaz_v._Massachusetts

    Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305 (2009), [1] is a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that it was a violation of the Sixth Amendment right of confrontation for a prosecutor to submit a chemical drug test report without the testimony of the person who performed the test. [2]

  4. Eisenstadt v. Baird - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eisenstadt_v._Baird

    Case history; Prior: Habeas corpus petition dismissed, Baird v.Eisenstadt, 310 F. Supp. 951 (D. Mass. 1970); reversed, 429 F.2d 1398 (1st Cir. 1970).: Subsequent: None: Holding; A Massachusetts law criminalizing the distribution of contraceptives to unmarried persons for the purpose of preventing pregnancy violated the right to equal protection.

  5. List of off-label promotion pharmaceutical settlements

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_off-label...

    The following are settlements reached with US authorities against pharmaceutical companies to resolve allegations of "off-label" promotion of drugs. Under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, it is illegal for pharmaceutical companies to promote their products for uses not approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and corporations that market drugs for off-label indications may ...

  6. Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massachusetts_v._United...

    Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services 682 F.3d 1 is a United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit decision that affirmed the judgment of the District Court for the District of Massachusetts in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), the section that defines the terms "marriage" as ...

  7. In Massachusetts, Sex Workers Get Charged and Clients ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/massachusetts-sex-workers...

    Follow-Up. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit will hear oral arguments today in several cases brought against a federal law targeting TikTok. "The hearing consolidates ...

  8. Commonwealth v. Twitchell - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commonwealth_v._Twitchell

    Commonwealth v. Twitchell, 416 Mass. 114, 617 N.E.2d 609 (1993), [1] was the most prominent of a series of criminal cases, in the late 1980s and early 1990s, in which parents who were members of the Christian Science church were prosecuted for the deaths of children whose medical conditions had been treated only by Christian Science prayer.

  9. Dying To Be Free - The Huffington Post

    projects.huffingtonpost.com/dying-to-be-free...

    Just over the Ohio River the picture is just as bleak. Between 2011 and 2012, heroin deaths increased by 550 percent in Kentucky and have continued to climb steadily. This past December alone, five emergency rooms in Northern Kentucky saved 123 heroin-overdose patients; those ERs saw at least 745 such cases in 2014, 200 more than the previous year.