enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Clarence Thomas thinks domestic abusers should be ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/clarence-thomas-thinks-domestic...

    The Supreme Court has upheld a law designed to keep firearms out of the hands of domestic abusers.. The court’s 8-1 ruling in United States v Rahimi on Friday holds that “when an individual ...

  3. What The Supreme Court’s Rahimi Ruling Means For Everyone - AOL

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-rahimi-ruling-means...

    The data is clear: Laws preventing people with domestic-violence restraining orders from accessing firearms can help save lives. Abusers with firearms are five times more likely to kill their ...

  4. Scripps News speaks with domestic abuse survivor Kate Ranta ...

    www.aol.com/scripps-news-speaks-domestic-abuse...

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Friday ruled to uphold a federal ban on domestic abusers owning guns. In an 8-1 decision, the Supreme Court ruled that "when an individual has been found by a court to ...

  5. Supreme Court seems poised to keep guns away from domestic ...

    www.aol.com/supreme-court-seems-poised-keep...

    The Supreme Court appears likely to uphold a law that would keep firearms out of the hands of domestic violence offenders, after the justices heard two hours of arguments in another major Second ...

  6. Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Domestic_Violence_Offender...

    The Domestic Violence Offender Gun Ban, often called the "Lautenberg Amendment" ("Gun Ban for Individuals Convicted of a Misdemeanor Crime of Domestic Violence", Pub. L. 104–208 (text), [1 2]), is an amendment to the Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act of 1997, enacted by the 104th United States Congress in 1996, which bans access to firearms for life by people convicted of crimes of ...

  7. United States v. Rahimi - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Rahimi

    United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. 680 (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and whether it empowers the government to prohibit firearm possession by a person with a civil domestic violence restraining order in the absence of a corresponding criminal domestic violence conviction or charge.

  8. Should domestic abusers have the right to be armed? The ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/domestic-abusers-armed-supreme-court...

    A Texas man repeatedly violated a restraining order that forbids him from possessing a firearm under federal law. Justices will decide if judges went too far after they said it was ...

  9. Boyfriend loophole - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boyfriend_loophole

    This law was an amendment to the existing felon-in-possession laws and forbade the possession or commercial sale of a firearm by all convicted domestic violence abusers. [3] This amendment banned those convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence from shipping, transporting, owning, or using guns. [12]