Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
On 11 December 2023, the Supreme Court of India unanimously upheld the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A, while also directing the union government to restore the statehood of Jammu and Kashmir and hold legislative assembly elections no later than September 2024.
On Friday, the Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments on the TikTok divest-or-ban law. TikTok is asking the court to pause its divestment deadline, set for January 19. We're posting updates on ...
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments Wednesday in a major case over transgender health care for minors.The case focuses on Tennessee's ban on the treatment for minors in the state. The ...
Russell Ellis, who goes by "JollyGoodGinger," speaks to a live stream audience outside the U.S. Supreme Court after the court heard oral arguments on whether to overturn or delay a law that could ...
A map of the disputed Kashmir region showing the areas under Indian, Pakistani, and Chinese administration. On 5 August 2019, the government of India revoked the special status, or autonomy, granted under Article 370 of the Indian constitution to Jammu and Kashmir—a region administered by India as a state which consists of the larger part of Kashmir which has been the subject of dispute ...
Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962), is the first landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in which the Eighth Amendment of the Constitution was interpreted to prohibit criminalization of particular acts or conduct, as contrasted with prohibiting the use of a particular form of punishment for a crime.
Live courts coverage: Trump sentenced; Giuliani faces contempt while Supreme Court chilly on TikTok. January 10, 2025 at 1:50 PM ... Follow below for live updates from a busy courts day.
Berghuis v. Thompkins, 560 U.S. 370 (2010), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held that, unless and until a criminal suspect explicitly states that they are relying on their right to remain silent, their voluntary statements may be used in court and police may continue to question them.