enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tarasoff_v._Regents_of_the...

    Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California , 17 Cal. 3d 425, 551 P.2d 334, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 ( Cal. 1976), was a case in which the Supreme Court of California held that mental health professionals have a duty to protect individuals who are being threatened with bodily harm by a patient.

  3. Duty to warn - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_warn

    Other cases similar to the issues addressed in the Tarasoff case have been brought to the attention of the courts, such as the Jablonski by Pahls v. United States. The conclusion of that case extended the responsibility entailed in the duty to warn with the judgment that the clinician may be liable for failure to review previous records, which ...

  4. Duty to protect - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duty_to_protect

    In medical law and medical ethics, the duty to protect is the responsibility of a mental health professional to protect patients and others from foreseeable harm. [1] If a client makes statements that suggest suicidal or homicidal ideation, the clinician has the responsibility to take steps to warn potential victims, and if necessary, initiate involuntary commitment.

  5. ‘12 Badass Women’ by Huffington Post

    testkitchen.huffingtonpost.com/badass-women

    Victoria Woodhull was the first woman to run for president in the U.S. and she made her historic run in 1872 – before women even had the right to vote! She supported women's suffrage as well as welfare for the poor, and though it was frowned upon at the time, she didn't shy away from being vocal about sexual freedom.

  6. Talk: Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Tarasoff_v._Regents...

    The first case, Tarasoff I, imposed a "duty to warn". For a number of reasons, this caused great uproar within the mental health profession. The (California) Supreme Court revisited the case a year-and-a-half later. They modified the first case, replacing a "duty to warn" with a "duty to protect". This distinction between the first and second ...

  7. Here's the evidence presented against Donald Trump in his ...

    www.aol.com/news/heres-evidence-presented...

    Below are some of the most important pieces of evidence laid out in the prosecution’s case. 💡 August 2015: The alleged scheme is hatched Trump officially announced his presidential run in ...

  8. No. 18 Iowa State tries to contain No. 13 Miami in Pop-Tarts Bowl

    www.aol.com/no-18-iowa-state-tries-165931074.html

    Fans will have one more chance to watch Cam Ward orchestrate the nation's No. 1 offense when No. 13 Miami plays No. 18 Iowa State in Saturday's Pop-Tarts Bowl at Orlando, Fla.

  9. List of common misconceptions about arts and culture

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_common...

    However, that case was not about shouting "fire" and the decision was later overturned by Brandenburg v. Ohio in 1969. [163] [164] The US Armed Forces have generally forbidden military enlistment as a form of deferred adjudication (that is, an option for convicts to avoid jail time) since the 1980s. [165]