enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Version history for TLS/SSL support in web browsers

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Version_history_for_TLS/...

    SSL 2.0 (insecure) SSL 3.0 (insecure) TLS 1.0 (deprecated) TLS 1.1 (deprecated) TLS 1.2 TLS 1.3 EV certificate SHA-2 certificate ECDSA certificate BEAST CRIME POODLE (SSLv3) RC4 FREAK Logjam Protocol selection by user Microsoft Internet Explorer (1–10) [n 20] Windows Schannel: 1.x: Windows 3.1, 95, NT, [n 21] [n 22] Mac OS 7, 8: No SSL/TLS ...

  3. Token Binding - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Token_Binding

    The Token Binding Protocol Version 1.0. [5] Allows client/server applications to create long-lived, uniquely identifiable TLS bindings spanning multiple TLS sessions and connections. Applications are then enabled to cryptographically bind security tokens to the TLS layer, preventing token export and replay attacks.

  4. List of HTTP status codes - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_HTTP_status_codes

    It alerts the client to wait for a final response. The message consists only of the status line and optional header fields, and is terminated by an empty line. As the HTTP/1.0 standard did not define any 1xx status codes, servers must not [note 1] send a 1xx response to an HTTP/1.0 compliant client except under experimental conditions. 100 Continue

  5. Transport Layer Security - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security

    The PCI Council suggested that organizations migrate from TLS 1.0 to TLS 1.1 or higher before June 30, 2018. [41] [42] In October 2018, Apple, Google, Microsoft, and Mozilla jointly announced they would deprecate TLS 1.0 and 1.1 in March 2020. [20] TLS 1.0 and 1.1 were formally deprecated in RFC 8996 in March 2021.

  6. Comparison of TLS implementations - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_TLS...

    A workaround for SSL 3.0 and TLS 1.0, roughly equivalent to random IVs from TLS 1.1, was widely adopted by many implementations in late 2011. [30] In 2014, the POODLE vulnerability of SSL 3.0 was discovered, which takes advantage of the known vulnerabilities in CBC, and an insecure fallback negotiation used in browsers. [31]

  7. Cipher suite - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cipher_suite

    Both the client and the server must support the agreed upon cipher suite. If the client and server do not agree on a cipher suite, no connection will be made. [8] This selection process occurs during the TLS Handshake Protocol. TLS 1.3 includes a TLS Handshake Protocol that differs compared to past and the current version of TLS/SSL.

  8. Server Name Indication - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Server_Name_Indication

    Encrypted Client Hello (ECH) is a TLS 1.3 protocol extension that enables encryption of the whole Client Hello message, which is sent during the early stage of TLS 1.3 negotiation. [10] ECH encrypts the payload with a public key that the relying party (a web browser) needs to know in advance, which means ECH is most effective with large CDNs ...

  9. HTTPS - Wikipedia

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HTTPS

    This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 3 January 2025. Extension of the HTTP communications protocol to support TLS encryption Internet protocol suite Application layer BGP DHCP (v6) DNS FTP HTTP (HTTP/3) HTTPS IMAP IRC LDAP MGCP MQTT NNTP NTP OSPF POP PTP ONC/RPC RTP RTSP RIP SIP SMTP SNMP SSH Telnet TLS/SSL XMPP more... Transport layer TCP ...