enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Unfair terms in English contract law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfair_terms_in_English...

    The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 regulates clauses that exclude or limit terms implied by the common law or statute. Its general pattern is that if clauses restrict liability, particularly negligence , of one party, the clause must pass the "reasonableness test" in section 11 and Schedule 2.

  3. Phillips Products Ltd v Hyland and Hamstead Plant Hire Co Ltd

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillips_Products_Ltd_v...

    Condition 8 of their contract stated the driver would be deemed to be the employee of Phillips Products. The driver crashed into Phillips’ factory wall. Phillips argued that Hamstead Plant Hire should pay for the damage caused by Mr Hyland, because condition 8 was caught by UCTA 1977 section 2(2) and was unreasonable. Hamstead Plant Hire ...

  4. Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfair_Contract_Terms_Act_1977

    The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (c. 50) is an act of Parliament of the United Kingdom which regulates contracts by restricting the operation and legality of some contract terms. It extends to nearly all forms of contract and one of its most important functions is limiting the applicability of disclaimers of liability. The terms extend to ...

  5. Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfair_Terms_in_Consumer...

    In the complex case of Director General of Fair Trading v First National Bank, [2] the bank's seemingly unfair interest term was found to be in good faith as the term guarded the bank from a possible situation of receiving no interest defeating their business objective. Schedule 2 sets out an indicative, non-exhaustive list of terms that would ...

  6. George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd v Finney Lock Seeds Ltd

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Mitchell_(Chester...

    Finney Lock Seeds Ltd agreed to supply George Mitchell (Chesterhall) Ltd with 30 lb of Dutch winter cabbage seed for £201.60. An invoice sent with the delivery was considered part of the contract and limited liability to replacing 'any seeds or plants sold' if defective (clause 1) and excluding all liability for loss or damage or consequential loss or damage from use of the seed (clause 2 ...

  7. St Albans City and DC v International Computers Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St_Albans_City_and_DC_v...

    The Salvage Association v CAP Financial Services Ltd [1995] FSR 655, failure to show evidence of why a particular limit is put in may lead to it being unreasonable; British Fermentation Products Ltd v Compair [1999] 2 All ER (Comm) 389, Judge Bowsher QC had some trouble with the ‘written standard terms of business’ line in UCTA 1977 s 3, holding that the industry's model forms of contract ...

  8. Thompson v T Lohan (Plant Hire) Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thompson_v_T_Lohan_(Plant...

    Thompson v T Lohan (Plant Hire) Ltd [1987] 2 All ER 631 is an English contract law case on the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977.. It is usually read with Phillips Products Ltd v Hyland and Hamstead Plant Hire Co Ltd [1] where a similar contract clause (an older version of the same standard industry term) was held to be unreasonable, but where the liability being shifted had the effect of leaving ...

  9. Messr UK Ltd v Britvic Soft Drinks Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Messr_UK_Ltd_v_Britvic...

    A term in the contract limited liability of Messer under s 14 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 (which by virtue of UCTA 1977 can only be limited as it satisfies the requirement of reasonableness). The judge found that the only relevant express term in the supply agreement was that the carbon dioxide would conform with British Standard 4105.