enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia:Featured article review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article...

    Concerned editors should give article watchers two to three weeks to respond to concerns before nominating the article for Featured article review. During this step, articles are not yet listed on this page (but they can be added to Wikipedia:Featured article review/notices given, and removed from there once posted here). 2. Featured article ...

  3. Wikipedia : Reviewing good articles

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reviewing_good...

    The review should not be influenced by beliefs about how the article could be made "perfect", by how the reviewer would have written the article, or by personal feelings about the article topic. [2] Reviewers should aim to advise on content and form rather than to impose their preferences.

  4. Review article - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Review_article

    A review article is an article that summarizes the current state of understanding on a topic within ... For example, science-based review articles heavily utilise ...

  5. Wikipedia:Featured articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_articles

    Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at featured article review. On non-mobile versions of our website, a small bronze star icon on the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is featured. On most smartphones and tablets you can also select "Desktop" at the very bottom of ...

  6. Literature review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literature_review

    A literature review can be a type of review article. In this sense, a literature review is a scholarly paper that presents the current knowledge including substantive findings as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. Literature reviews are secondary sources and do

  7. Wikipedia:Peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Peer_review

    I've listed this article for peer review because this article provides a very well-researched overview of nanomedicine, detailing its applications in drug delivery, imaging, sensing, and vaccine development which are supported by numerous examples and references.

  8. Wikipedia : Featured article review/Albert Einstein

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article...

    Remove - the article is still undercited, a number of the references used don't appear to be to reliable sources, and some of the references can't be tracked down (an ibid to a non-specific source). There are still prose and organizational problems in the article, which appears to have grown piecemeal, and it doesn't appear that anyone is ...

  9. Wikipedia:Academic peer review - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Academic_peer_review

    This page is an attempt to offer a simpler alternative to Wikipedia:Scientific peer review.. If you wish to have an article reviewed by an expert (or better, two experts) in the subject, simply find an appropriate expert and ask them to review the article.