Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at featured article review. On non-mobile versions of our website, a small bronze star icon on the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is featured. On most smartphones and tablets you can also select "Desktop" at the very bottom of ...
Concerned editors should give article watchers two to three weeks to respond to concerns before nominating the article for Featured article review. During this step, articles are not yet listed on this page (but they can be added to Wikipedia:Featured article review/notices given, and removed from there once posted here). 2. Featured article ...
The review should not be influenced by beliefs about how the article could be made "perfect", by how the reviewer would have written the article, or by personal feelings about the article topic. [2] Reviewers should aim to advise on content and form rather than to impose their preferences.
Reviewing new articles; Peer review, a process for receiving ideas and feedback from other editors about articles; Featured article review and Good article reassessment, information about reviewing Featured Articles and Good Articles to see if they still qualify for that status; Specific user groups which mention reviewing include: Pending ...
Wikipedia:Good articles - a system whereby articles can be rated and broadly established as being of reasonable quality, while being commented upon by independent review. Wikipedia:Featured articles - a rigorous review of articles which are desired to meet the highest standards and showcase Wikipedia's capability to produce high quality work.
Wikipedia's peer review process is a feature where an editor can receive feedback from others on how to improve an article they are working on, or receive advice about a specific issue queried by the editor.
A good example of such an article being ring-tailed cardinalfish in June 2018. Some sectioning is attempted to categorize new information in the article. Even though the definition of a Start-class article can vary between editors, Wikipedia:Content assessment defined it as an article that "should [not] be in any danger of being speedily deleted."
Articles start with a lead section (WP:CREATELEAD) summarising the most important points of the topic.The lead section is the first part of the article; it comes above the first header, and may contain a lead image which is representative of the topic, and/or an infobox that provides a few key facts, often statistical, such as dates and measurements.