enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Trump v. Anderson - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._Anderson

    Trump v. Anderson, 601 U.S. 100 (2024), is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously held that states could not determine eligibility for federal office, including the presidency, under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.

  3. List of United States court cases involving the Fourteenth ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    the United States Supreme Court ruled that marriage is a fundamental right guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, and therefore must be afforded to same-sex couples. The ruling ensured that statewide bans on same-sex marriage could not be held up as constitutional. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard: 2023 600 U.S. 181

  4. Richardson v. Ramirez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richardson_v._Ramirez

    Richardson v. Ramirez, 418 U.S. 24 (1974), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 6–3, that convicted felons could be barred from voting beyond their sentence and parole without violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.

  5. How using the 14th Amendment against Trump went from a ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/using-14th-amendment-against-trump...

    The justices are reviewing a landmark decision from Colorado’s top court, which concluded the 14th Amendment’s “insurrectionist ban” applies to Trump. ... The case was brought against ...

  6. Takeaways from Trump’s big win at the Supreme Court in the ...

    www.aol.com/takeaways-trump-big-win-supreme...

    Those actions, the state court ruled, violated Section 3 of the 14th Amendment and left Trump ineligible to appear on the state’s ballot. Since then, both Maine and Illinois also moved to take ...

  7. McDonald v. City of Chicago - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonald_v._City_of_Chicago

    McDonald v. City of Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), was a landmark [1] decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that found that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms", as protected under the Second Amendment, is incorporated by the Fourteenth Amendment and is thereby enforceable against the states.

  8. Opinion: How the Supreme Court got things so wrong on Trump ...

    www.aol.com/opinion-supreme-court-just-made...

    In ruling that Donald Trump should stay on the ballot in 2024, the Supreme Court has delivered a mortal blow to Section 3 of the 14th amendment of the Constitution that basically eviscerates its ...

  9. Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Clara_County_v...

    Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company, 118 U.S. 394 (1886), is a corporate law case of the United States Supreme Court concerning taxation of railroad properties. The case is most notable for a headnote stating that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment grants constitutional protections to corporations.