Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[3]: 5 So "it is my duty to do act A from the sense that it is my duty to do act A". [3]: 5 To avoid this problem, Ross suggests that moral goodness should be distinguished from moral rightness or moral obligation. [3]: 5 The moral value of an action depends on the motive but the motive is not relevant for whether the act is right or wrong.
A claim right is a right which entails that another person has a duty to the right-holder. Somebody else must do or refrain from doing something to or for the claim holder, such as perform a service or supply a product for him or her; that is, he or she has a claim to that service or product (another term is thing in action). [3]
For something to be a basic action it is not just important what the agent can do but what the agent actually does. So raising one's right hand may only count as a basic action if it is done directly through the right hand. If the agent uses her left hand to lift the right hand then the raising of the right hand is not a basic action anymore ...
He continued: “I do think that there’s really something to it…If you’re discussing any idea, there’s all these reasons why it might not work. And those reasons are probably true.
Kant argued that the only absolutely good thing is a good will, and so the single determining factor of whether an action is morally right is the will, or motive of the person doing it. If they are acting on a bad maxim—e.g., 'I will lie'—then their action is wrong, even if some good consequences come of it.
We want to do something really special," Odegaard told a pre-match news conference. "We want to win everything basically - that's the mindset of everyone. We want to win trophies, we want to win ...
With Donald Trump's victory and California's center-right shift on election day, the Democrat has begun popping up more in the red reaches of the state. It is something he should have done long ago.
H. L. A. Hart argued that if there are any rights at all, there must be the right to liberty, for all the others would depend upon this. T. H. Green argued that "if there are such things as rights at all, then, there must be a right to life and liberty, or, to put it more properly to free life."