Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
(2) Whether 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(3)(E) deprives this Court of certiorari jurisdiction over the grant or denial of an authorization by a court of appeals to file a second or successive motion to vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. January 17, 2025: Department of Education v. Career Colleges and Schools of Texas: 24-413
Trump's team asked the Supreme Court to reject the expedited timeline and allow the appeals court to consider the case first. [31] [32] On December 22, the Supreme Court denied the special counsel's request, leaving the case to the appeals court. [33] On January 9, 2024, the D.C. Court of Appeals heard arguments in the immunity dispute.
The Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered that an Oklahoma man convicted of murder, Richard Glossip -- who has been scheduled for execution nine times and served his "last meal" three times -- must now ...
Court historians and other legal scholars consider each chief justice who presides over the Supreme Court of the United States to be the head of an era of the Court. [1] These lists are sorted chronologically by chief justice and include most major cases decided by the court.
The U.S. Supreme Court is set to consider on Wednesday a woman's civil rights lawsuit over the fatal police shooting of her son during a traffic stop in Houston in a case that could make it easier ...
America has a king after all. Make no mistake: That’s the ugly result of Monday morning’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling that Donald Trump is entitled to “absolute immunity” from criminal ...
The court stayed its decision until a ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court. On January 5, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court granted Trump's petition for a writ of certiorari seeking review of the Colorado Supreme Court ruling in Anderson v. Griswold on an accelerated pace; oral arguments were held on February 8, 2024.
United States v. Rahimi, 602 U.S. 680 (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution and whether it empowers the government to prohibit firearm possession by a person with a civil domestic violence restraining order in the absence of a corresponding criminal domestic violence conviction or charge.