enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Opinion - The looming post-Chevron fight over the ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/opinion-looming-post-chevron-fight...

    In the wake of the Supreme Court’s departure from the precedent of Chevron deference, a new battle is brewing.Mere months after the court’s landmark ruling in Loper Bright Enterprises v ...

  3. Roberts argued that the Chevron deference violated a provision in the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) that states that a reviewing court “shall decide all relevant questions of law,” but ...

  4. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v...

    In 2002 Chevron was able to invoke Chevron deference to win another case, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Echazabal, 536 U.S. 73 (2002), before the Supreme Court. In a unanimous decision, the Court applied Chevron deference and upheld as reasonable an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regulation, which allowed an employer to refuse to hire an ...

  5. What it means for the Supreme Court to throw out Chevron ...

    www.aol.com/news/means-supreme-court-throw...

    The Biden administration has defended the law, warning that overturning so-called Chevron deference would be destabilizing and could bring a “convulsive shock” to the nation's legal system.

  6. Chevron takeaways: Supreme Court ruling removes frequently ...

    www.aol.com/news/chevron-takeaways-supreme-court...

    Federal rules that impact virtually every aspect of everyday life, from the food we eat and the cars we drive to the air we breathe, could be at risk after a wide-ranging Supreme Court ruling Friday.

  7. Major questions doctrine - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Major_questions_doctrine

    The narrower version of the major questions doctrine is as an exception to Chevron deference. Under Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984), courts defer to reasonable agency interpretations of ambiguous provisions: First, always, is the question whether Congress has directly spoken to the precise question at issue.

  8. United States v. Mead Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Mead_Corp.

    United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court that addressed the issue of when Chevron deference should be applied. In an 8–1 majority decision, the Court determined that Chevron deference applies when Congress delegated authority to the agency generally to make rules carrying the force ...

  9. Column: With its 'Chevron' ruling, the Supreme Court claims ...

    www.aol.com/news/column-chevron-ruling-supreme...

    Chevron deference was very much a product of its time, Sunstein noted. In the 1960s and 1970s, “federal courts had been aggressively reviewing agency action (and inaction), often with the goal ...