Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Summary Description 7th Circuit Judges Wood, Easterbrook, Kanne.png English: United States Court of Appeals Judge William J. Bauer moderates a panel discussion with Chief Circuit Judge Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge Frank H Easterbrook and Circuit Judge MIchael S. Kanne
This image might not be in the public domain outside of the United States; this especially applies in the countries and areas that do not apply the rule of the shorter term for US works, such as Canada, Mainland China (not Hong Kong or Macao), Germany, Mexico, and Switzerland.
In his 2010 book I Love It When You Talk Retro, author Ralph Keyes connects the term to the Perry Mason TV series, which ran from 1957 to 1966. "As played by portly Raymond Burr", he wrote, "Perry Mason was a resourceful lawyer who generally pulled his client's chestnuts out of the fire at the last minute with some deftly posed question or just-discovered piece of evidence.
The phrase has become a rallying cry for legal reformers who view courts, tribunals, judges, arbitrators, administrative law judges, commissions [A] or governments as acting too slowly in resolving legal issues — either because the case is too complex, the existing system is too complex or overburdened, or because the issue or party in ...
Jeffrey_Cummings,_U.S._Magistrate_Judge.png (353 × 394 pixels, file size: 226 KB, MIME type: image/png) This is a file from the Wikimedia Commons . Information from its description page there is shown below.
Famous people quotes about life. 46. “There is only one certainty in life and that is that nothing is certain.” —G.K. Chesterton (June 1926) 47. “Make it a rule of life never to regret and ...
More than 100 pages use this file. The following list shows the first 100 pages that use this file only. A full list is available.. Act of Congress; Administrative Decisions Tribunal of New South Wales
Legal formalism is both a descriptive and normative theory of how judges should decide cases. [1] In its descriptive sense, formalists maintain that judges reach their decisions by applying uncontroversial principles to the facts; formalists believe that there is an underlying logic to the many legal principles that may be applied in different cases.