enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enfish,_LLC_v._Microsoft_Corp.

    Enfish, LLC v. Microsoft Corp., 822 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2016), [1] is a 2016 decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in which the court, for the second time since the United States Supreme Court decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank upheld the patent–eligibility of software patent claims. [2]

  3. Davis–Stirling Common Interest Development Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Davis–Stirling_Common...

    As of January 1, 2014, Title 6 (commencing with Section 1350) of Part 4 of Division 2 of the Civil Code was repealed and was effectively replaced by newly-added Part 5 (commencing with Section 4000) of Division 4 of the Civil Code. The Davis–Stirling Act was completely renumbered and reorganized within the California Civil Code.

  4. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_v._Entertainment...

    Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association, 564 U.S. 786 (2011), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court that struck down a 2005 California law banning the sale of certain violent video games to children without parental supervision.

  5. CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21

    highline.huffingtonpost.com/miracleindustry/...

    a comprehensive index by volume number and page number to the summary under paragraph (c) of this section, the technical sections under paragraph (d) of this section, and the supporting information under paragraph (f) of this section. (c) Summary. (1) An application is required to contain a summary of the

  6. California Court Case Management System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Court_Case...

    In 2002, the California Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC) started the Second-Generation Electronic Filing Specification (2GEFS) project. [5]After a $200,000 consultant's report declared the project ready for a final push, the Judicial Council of California scrapped the program in 2012 after $500 million in costs.

  7. City of Ontario v. Quon - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Ontario_v._Quon

    Ortega, a case arising from the search of a supervising physician's office and records at a California public hospital. By a 5-4 margin the court had ruled that while public employees had Fourth Amendment protections, the search was reasonable and constitutional and that other such warrantless searches of public employees' belongings or ...

  8. Section V softball is stacked with talent: 136 players on AGR ...

    www.aol.com/section-v-softball-stacked-talent...

    Section V's softball players to watch in 2024 Athletes were nominated by Section V coaches and the Democrat and Chronicle staff. Coaches can email mslaughter1@gannett.com to include their softball ...

  9. Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_Corp._of_America_v...

    The case centered around Sony's manufacture of the Betamax VCR, which used cassettes like this to store potentially copyrighted information.. Immediately after their loss at the Supreme Court, the entertainment companies lobbied Congress to pass legislation that would protect them from the effects of home copying.