Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Wikipedia is a great place to start. Wikipedia is not paper , and that is a good thing because articles are not strictly limited in size as they are with paper encyclopedias. Articles steadily become more polished as they develop, particularly if one person is working on an article with reasonable regularity (inclining others to help the ...
Wikipedia pages often cite reliable secondary sources that vet data from primary sources. If the information on another Wikipedia page (which you want to cite as the source) has a primary or secondary source, you ought be able to cite that primary or secondary source and eliminate the middleman (or "middle-page" in this case).
See also why Wikipedia is so great. Learning to write in a neutral point of view is a useful intellectual exercise, since it requires cultivating humility and respect for the views of others. Wikipedia is a remarkable phenomenon of social organization; learning how things work here provides valuable lessons for many other kinds of organizations.
Wikipedia is "a major player in the internet landscape" [4] and "if you want to control “the truth”, you want to control Wikipedia." [5] "It is high time not only to acknowledge Wikipedia's quality but also to start actively promoting its use and development in academia" [6] Surveys tell us:
About Today's featured article. This star symbolizes the featured content on Wikipedia. Featured articles (FAs) are some of the best articles in the English Wikipedia. They are written by volunteers about subjects of their own choosing, and evaluated by other volunteers against the featured article criteria.
(e.g., Bill Clinton did this good thing but some say it was bad. He also did this bad thing but some say it was not so bad as opposed to Bill Clinton did this thing and then that thing.) To put it another way, good writing makes NPOV flow like an encyclopedia; not-so-good writing makes it flow like "Crossfire".
This argument goes thus: Search for any sensible topic on any search engine. Most of the time, Wikipedia or another Wikimedia project will be one of the top results. No other website reaches this level of omnipresence. The reason Wikipedia is so high on the list is because so many people use Wikipedia despite the warnings.
Wikipedia is great at being free, brawling, universal, and instantaneous. Wikipedia entries are nothing but the emergent effect of all the angry thrashing going on below the surface...if you want to really navigate the truth via Wikipedia, you have to dig into those "history" and "discuss" pages hanging off of every entry.