enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Utilitarianism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

    An article in the American Economic Journal has addressed the issue of Utilitarian ethics within redistribution of wealth. The journal stated that taxation of the wealthy is the best way to make use of the disposable income they receive. This says that the money creates utility for the most people by funding government services. [150]

  3. Utilitarian bioethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarian_bioethics

    Utilitarian bioethics is based on the premise that the distribution of resources is a zero-sum game, and therefore medical decisions should logically be made on the basis of each person's total future productive value and happiness, their chance of survival from the present, and the resources required for treatment.

  4. Preference utilitarianism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preference_utilitarianism

    Preference utilitarianism (also known as preferentialism) is a form of utilitarianism in contemporary philosophy. [1] Unlike value monist forms of utilitarianism, preferentialism values actions that fulfill the most personal interests for the entire circle of people affected by said action.

  5. Two-level utilitarianism - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two-level_utilitarianism

    Two-level utilitarianism is a utilitarian theory of ethics according to which a person's moral decisions should be based on a set of moral rules, except in certain rare situations where it is more appropriate to engage in a 'critical' level of moral reasoning.

  6. Kantian ethics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kantian_ethics

    The Utilitarian philosopher John Stuart Mill criticizes Kant for not realizing that moral laws are justified by a moral intuition based on utilitarian principles (that the greatest good for the greatest number ought to be sought). Mill argued that Kant's ethics could not explain why certain actions are wrong without appealing to utilitarianism ...

  7. Moral universalizability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_universalizability

    The general concept or principle of moral universalizability is that moral principles, maxims, norms, facts, predicates, rules, etc., are universally true; that is, if they are true as applied to some particular case (an action, person, etc.) then they are true of all other cases of this sort.

  8. Utilitarianism (book) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism_(book)

    Utilitarianism is an 1861 essay written by English philosopher and economist John Stuart Mill, considered to be a classic exposition and defense of utilitarianism in ethics. It was originally published as a series of three separate articles in Fraser's Magazine in 1861 before it was collected and reprinted as a single work in 1863. [ 1 ]

  9. Felicific calculus - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felicific_calculus

    The felicific calculus is an algorithm formulated by utilitarian philosopher Jeremy Bentham (1748–1832) for calculating the degree or amount of pleasure that a specific action is likely to induce. Bentham, an ethical hedonist , believed the moral rightness or wrongness of an action to be a function of the amount of pleasure or pain that it ...