Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Concurrent validity may be used as a practical substitute for predictive validity. In the example above, predictive validity would be the best choice for validating an employment test, because using the employment test on existing employees may not be a strong analog for using the tests for selection. Reduced motivation and restriction of range ...
Although concurrent and predictive validity are similar, it is cautioned to keep the terms and findings separated. "Concurrent validity should not be used as a substitute for predictive validity without an appropriate supporting rationale." [3] Criterion validity is typically assessed by comparison with a gold standard test. [4]
In psychometrics, predictive validity is the extent to which a score on a scale or test predicts scores on some criterion measure. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] For example, the validity of a cognitive test for job performance is the correlation between test scores and, for example, supervisor performance ratings.
E.g. a scale that is 5 pounds off is reliable but not valid. A test cannot be valid unless it is reliable. Validity is also dependent on the measurement measuring what it was designed to measure, and not something else instead. [6] Validity (similar to reliability) is a relative concept; validity is not an all-or-nothing idea.
Test validity is the extent to which a test (such as a chemical, physical, or scholastic test) accurately measures what it is supposed to measure.In the fields of psychological testing and educational testing, "validity refers to the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores entailed by proposed uses of tests". [1]
Concurrent validity, the extent to which a test correlates with another measure Predictive validity , the extent to which a score on a scale or test predicts scores on some other measure Discriminant validity , the degree to which results a test of one concept can be expected to differ from tests of other concepts that should not be correlated ...
In statistics, model validation is the task of evaluating whether a chosen statistical model is appropriate or not. Oftentimes in statistical inference, inferences from models that appear to fit their data may be flukes, resulting in a misunderstanding by researchers of the actual relevance of their model.
Incremental validity is a type of statistical validity that assesses whether a new psychometric assessment has more predictive ability than existing methods of assessment. [1] It seeks to determine whether the new assessment adds information that cannot be obtained with simpler, already existing methods.