Ad
related to: is the star reading program reliable and valid sources of knowledgeinfo.curriculumassociates.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
STAR Reading, STAR Early Literacy and STAR Math are standardized, computer-adaptive assessments created by Renaissance Learning, Inc., for use in K–12 education. Each is a " Tier 2 " assessment of a skill (reading practice, math practice, and early literacy, respectively that can be used any number of times due to item-bank technology.
Renaissance is known for creating Accelerated Reader, which is used in about 35,000 schools, as well as Star computer-adaptive assessments, used in more than 37,000 schools, making Star Assessments the most widely used computer-adaptive assessment in the U.S. Pre-K–12 educational market, according to company figures.
The STAR Program was the cornerstone of the California Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). The primary objective of the PSAA is to help schools improve the academic achievement of all students. From the 1970s, California students took the same statewide test, called the California Assessment Program (CAP).
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, commonly referred to as its acronym STAAR (/ s t ɑːr / STAR), is a series of standardized tests used in Texas public primary and secondary schools to assess a student's achievements and knowledge learned in the grade level.
Source criticism (or information evaluation) is the process of evaluating an information source, i.e.: a document, a person, a speech, a fingerprint, a photo, an observation, or anything used in order to obtain knowledge. In relation to a given purpose, a given information source may be more or less valid, reliable or relevant.
Identifying reliable sources (science) Identifying reliable sources (medicine) Identifying and using style guides (WP:STYLEGUIDES) Using maps and similar sources in Wikipedia articles ; Other. Reliable sources/Noticeboard ; Reliable sources/Perennial sources ; Common knowledge
This doesn't mean that no article on the topic should ever exist! However, just because someday someone might write a valid, credible, verifiable article that meets Wikipedia policy does not mean that the inferior, invalid article should remain as a placeholder. Reliable sources are a requirement for an article, not an objective.
If one reliable source says A and another reliable source says B, do not join A and B together to imply a conclusion C not mentioned by either of the sources. This would be improper editorial synthesis of published material to imply a new conclusion, which is original research .
Ad
related to: is the star reading program reliable and valid sources of knowledgeinfo.curriculumassociates.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month