Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Tellabs Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, 551 U.S. 308 (2007), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled on the interpretation of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995's requirement of scienter in a civil action in apply to Tellabs and Makor Issues & Rights. [1]
Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. 551 U.S. 308 (2007) The proper standard for determining whether a plaintiff has alleged a "strong inference" of scienter under the PSLRA: Morse v. Frederick: 551 U.S. 393 (2007) free speech rights of high school students ("Bong Hits 4 Jesus") CBOCS West v. Humphries: 551 U.S. 442 (2008)
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Pub. L. 104–67 (text), 109 Stat. 737 (codified as amended in scattered sections of 15 U.S.C.) ("PSLRA") implemented several substantive changes in the United States that have affected certain cases brought under the federal securities laws, including changes related to pleading, discovery, liability, class representation, and awards fees ...
Naperville, Ill.-based Tellabs needs a new CFO. In a vain attempt to avoid tanking its stock price, Tellabs announced Monday that company Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ...
He was the chairman of the executive board of the Telecommunications Industry Association. [13] In 2009 Tellabs acquired WiChorus, a San-Jose based Silicon Valley start-up with a mobile packet core platform, a decision that led to the decline of their data business. [14]
Community for Creative Non-Violence v. Reid: 333 Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd. 334 Ex parte Curtis: 335 South Dakota v. Opperman: 336 United States v. Robel: 337 Bi-Metallic Investment Co. v. State Board of Equalization: 338 Department of the Interior v. Klamath Water Users Protective Ass'n: 339
Since then, he argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Milberg clients in Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, [4] and was involved in the briefing in opposition to the writ of certiorari in Pfizer, Inc. v. Abdullahi. [5]
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007), was a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States involving antitrust law and civil procedure.Authored by Justice David Souter, it established that parallel conduct, absent evidence of agreement, is insufficient to sustain an antitrust action under Section 1 of the Sherman Act.