enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Socially optimal firm size - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socially_optimal_firm_size

    Consequently, the societally optimal firm size is OQ 2, where long-run average cost is at its lowest level. The socially optimal firm size is the size for a company in a given industry at a given time which results in the lowest production costs per unit of output.

  3. Pigouvian tax - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigouvian_tax

    Second, Pigouvian taxes do not work in the long-term because the number of firms can vary. Third, an industry with a specific number of firms and scale can achieve the long-run social optimum (LRSO). The best option is to add an entry tax for potential firms and a subsidy for current firms to restrict a movement in the number of firms.

  4. Free entry - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_entry

    Socially optimal firm size; References. N. Gregory Mankiw, Principles of Economics. Fort Worth: Harcourt, 2001. This page was last edited on 11 November 2024, at ...

  5. Minimum efficient scale - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_efficient_scale

    For instance, if the minimum efficient scale is small relative to the overall size of the market (demand for the good), there will be a large number of firms. The firms in this market will be likely to behave in a perfectly competitive manner due to the large number of competitors. [ 4 ]

  6. Monopoly price - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_price

    The loss in both surplus' are deemed allocatively inefficient and not socially optimal. In contrast, when the firm has more information and discrimination is present, monopoly pricing becomes increasingly efficient as it approaches perfect discrimination through the various forms of price discrimination: Quantity Discount; Market Segregation

  7. Cost curve - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_curve

    If the firm is a perfect competitor in all input markets, and thus the per-unit prices of all its inputs are unaffected by how much of the inputs the firm purchases, then it can be shown that at a particular level of output, the firm has economies of scale (i.e., is operating in a downward sloping region of the long-run average cost curve) if ...

  8. Dollar-cost averaging: How to stop worrying about the market ...

    www.aol.com/finance/dollar-cost-averaging...

    In both scenarios, dollar-cost averaging provides better outcomes: At $60 per share. Dollar-cost averaging delivers a $6,900 gain, compared to a $2,400 gain with the lump sum approach.

  9. Microeconomics - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microeconomics

    Perfect competition leads to firms producing the socially optimal output level at the minimum possible cost per unit. Firms in perfect competition are "price takers" (they do not have enough market power to profitably increase the price of their goods or services).