enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Beall's List - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beall's_List

    The remaining 13 publishers had significantly increased the number of journals they were publishing, to a total of 1,650 individual journals (about 10% of the number of journals listed in Cabells' Predatory Reports in 2022), primarily due to the dramatic increase in the number of journals published by OMICS Publishing Group from 63 to 742.

  3. Predatory publishing - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predatory_publishing

    Beall's List was an example of a free blacklist, and Cabells' Predatory Reports is an example of a paid blacklist database. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) recommends against blindly trusting any list of fake or predatory journals, especially if they do not publish the criteria by which journals are evaluated. [83]

  4. Cabells' Predatory Reports - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabells'_Predatory_Reports

    Cabells' Predatory Reports is a paid subscription service provided by Cabell Publishing featuring a database of deceptive and predatory journals, and Journalytics is a database of "verified, reputable journals", with details about those journals' acceptance rates and invited article percentages. [1]

  5. Jeffrey Beall - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Beall

    Beall has estimated that predatory open access journals publish about 5–10 percent of all open access articles, [16] and that at least 25 percent of open access journals are predatory. [21] He has been particularly critical of OMICS Publishing Group , which he described as "the worst of the worst" in a 2016 Inside Higher Education article.

  6. Juniper Publishers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Juniper_Publishers

    Juniper Publishers was listed in Beall's List of potential predatory open-access publishers. [3] The company has been criticized for sending out email spam to scientists, calling for papers, [11] [12] [13] and for publishing at least one paper that violated research integrity (missing conflict of interest statement, missing informed consent by patients, and plagiarism).

  7. Template:Predatory open access source list - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Predatory_open...

    This template holds a list of predatory open access journals and publishers for MediaWiki:Abusefilter-warning-predatory, so that it can be edited by non-administrators. It should always be kept synchronized with Special:AbuseFilter/891.

  8. JSciMed Central - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JSciMed_Central

    JSciMed Central was listed in Beall's List of potential predatory open-access publishers. [4] The company has been criticized for sending out email spam to scientists, calling out for papers, [7] [8] [9] and to publish journals that have not achieved indexing in any recognized service, and were therefore considered as potential or probable predatory open-access journals.

  9. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Academy_of_Science...

    The World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology or WASET is a predatory publisher of open access academic journals.The publisher has been listed as a "potential, possible, or probable" predatory publisher by American library scientist Jeffrey Beall [1] and is listed as such by the Max Planck Society [2] and Stop Predatory Journals. [3]