Ad
related to: strict interpretation in a sentence structureThis site is a teacher's paradise! - The Bender Bunch
- 20,000+ Worksheets
Browse by grade or topic to find
the perfect printable worksheet.
- Education.com Blog
See what's new on Education.com,
explore classroom ideas, & more.
- Guided Lessons
Learn new concepts step-by-step
with colorful guided lessons.
- Interactive Stories
Enchant young learners with
animated, educational stories.
- 20,000+ Worksheets
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
As a result of this distinction, nearly all textualists reject strict constructionism in this sense. Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia, a major proponent of textualism, said that "no one ought to be" a strict constructionist, because the most literal interpretation meaning of a text can conflict with the commonly-understood or original ...
This sentence is semantically ambiguous. Specifically, it contains a scope ambiguity. This ambiguity cannot be resolved at surface structure, since someone, being within the verb phrase, must be lower in the structure than everyone. This case exemplifies the general fact that natural language is insufficiently specified for strict logical ...
This leads to the rule of semantic interpretation that takes pronouns and changes them into bound variables. [1] This rule is abbreviated as Pro→BV, where "Pro" stands for pronoun, and "BV" stands for bound variable. Simple sentence example. 9) [Betsy i loves her i dog] The strict reading of sentence 9) is that "Betsy loves her own dog".
Linguists use grammaticality judgements to investigate the syntactic structure of sentences. Generative linguists are largely of the opinion that for native speakers of natural languages , grammaticality is a matter of linguistic intuition , and reflects the innate linguistic competence of speakers.
[10] [11] [12] Logical metonymies are sentences like John began the book, where the verb to begin requires (subcategorizes) an event as its argument, but in a logical metonymy an object (i.e. the book) is found instead, and this forces to interpret the sentence by inferring an implicit event ("reading", "writing", or other prototypical actions ...
Phrase structure showing NEG- raising licensing a strict NPI This suggests that the negation originates in the embedded clause, as sister to the VP breathe a word , thus satisfying the locality of selection, being in the embedded clause before participating in raising, moving first to spec CP, and then to its host in the main clause.
A logical argument, seen as an ordered set of sentences, has a logical form that derives from the form of its constituent sentences; the logical form of an argument is sometimes called argument form. [6] Some authors only define logical form with respect to whole arguments, as the schemata or inferential structure of the argument. [7]
A locally ambiguous sentence is a sentence that contains an ambiguous phrase but has only one interpretation. [5] The ambiguity in a locally ambiguous sentence briefly stays and is resolved, i.e., disambiguated, by the end of the speech.
Ad
related to: strict interpretation in a sentence structureThis site is a teacher's paradise! - The Bender Bunch