enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. Relevance (law) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance_(law)

   The scheme of Chapter 3 of the Act deals with admissibility of evidence. [24] Evidence which is relevant is generally admissible, and evidence which is irrelevant is inadmissible. [24] Evidence is relevant if it is evidence which, if accepted, could rationally affect (directly or indirectly) the assessment of the probability of a fact in issue ...

3. California Public Records Act - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Public_Records_Act

   The California Public Records Act (Statutes of 1968, Chapter 1473; currently codified as Division 10 of Title 1 of the California Government Code) [1] was a law passed by the California State Legislature and signed by governor Ronald Reagan in 1968 requiring inspection or disclosure of governmental records to the public upon request, unless exempted by law.

4. California Evidence Code - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Evidence_Code

   The California Evidence Code (abbreviated to Evid. Code in the California Style Manual) is a California code that was enacted by the California State Legislature on May 18, 1965 [1] to codify the formerly mostly common-law law of evidence. Section 351 of the Code effectively abolished any remnants of the law of evidence not explicitly included ...

5. Public policy doctrines for the exclusion of relevant evidence

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_policy_doctrines...

   A subsequent remedial measure is an improvement, repair, or safety measure made after an injury has occurred. FRE 407 [dead link ‍] prohibits the admission of evidence of subsequent remedial measures to show defendant's (1) negligence; (2) culpable conduct; (3) a defect in defendant's product; (4) defect in the design of defendant's product; or (5) the need for a warning or instruction.

6. County of Santa Clara v. California First Amendment Coalition

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/County_of_Santa_Clara_v...

   California Public Records Act California First Amendment Coalition , 170 Cal. App. 4th 1301 (2009), was a case before the California Courts of Appeal dealing with the ability of a local California agency to limit the disclosure of, or require license agreements for, public records and data requested under the California Public Records Act (CPRA).

7. Admissible evidence - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Admissible_evidence

   The general rule in evidence is that all relevant evidence is admissible and all irrelevant evidence is inadmissible, though some countries (such as the United States and, to an extent, Australia) proscribe the prosecution from exploiting evidence obtained in violation of constitutional law, thereby rendering relevant evidence inadmissible.

8. Evidence (law) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_(law)

   Federal Rule 403 allows relevant evidence to be excluded "if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice", if it leads to confusion of the issues, if it is misleading or if it is a waste of time. California Evidence Code section 352 also allows for exclusion to avoid "substantial danger of undue prejudice."

9. Foundation (evidence) - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_(evidence)

   The Federal Rules of Evidence states rules regarding a piece of evidence's relevancy and whether or not it is admissible. [7] F.R.E. 402 states relevant evidence is admissible unless otherwise excluded by: "The U.S. Constitution, a federal statute, the Federal Rules of Evidence, or other rules proscribed by the Supreme Court."