Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The planning processes of most best practice organizations not only define what will be accomplished within a given time-frame, but also the numbers and types of human resources that will be needed to achieve the defined business goals (e.g., number of human resources; the required competencies; when the resources will be needed; etc.).
Human Resources for Health is a peer-reviewed open-access public health journal publishing original research and case studies on issues of information, planning, production, management, and governance of the health workforce, and their links with health care delivery and health outcomes, particularly as related to global health.
A survey of health care organizations conducted by consulting firm Mercer found that liquidity concerns led nearly 40% of health care organizations to draw from investment portfolio reserves to ...
“Employers are still concerned about health care affordability and ensuring that employees can afford the out-of-pocket costs when they seek care,” Tracy Watts, national leader of U.S. health ...
Generalists support employees directly with their questions, grievances, and work on a range of projects within the organization. They "may handle all aspects of human resources work, and thus require an extensive range of knowledge. The responsibilities of human resources generalists can vary widely, depending on their employer's needs."
UnitedHealth Group CEO Andrew Witty wrote in an op-ed that the company wants to continue to push for health care industry reforms following the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson.
Talent management (TM) is the anticipation of required human capital for an organization and the planning to meet those needs. [1] The field has been growing in significance and gaining interest among practitioners as well as in the scholarly debate over the past 10 years as of 2020, [2] particularly after McKinsey's 1997 research [3] and the 2001 book on The War for Talent.
Researchers have categorized two approaches to work force development, sector-based and place-based approaches. The sectoral advocate speaks for the demand side, emphasizing employer- or market-driven strategies, whereas the place-based practitioner is resolutely a believer in the virtue of the supply side: those low-income job seekers who need work and a pathway out of poverty.