enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Unfair terms in English contract law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfair_terms_in_English...

    The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 regulates clauses that exclude or limit terms implied by the common law or statute. Its general pattern is that if clauses restrict liability, particularly negligence , of one party, the clause must pass the "reasonableness test" in section 11 and Schedule 2.

  3. Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfair_Contract_Terms_Act_1977

    The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (c. 50) is an act of Parliament of the United Kingdom which regulates contracts by restricting the operation and legality of some contract terms. It extends to nearly all forms of contract and one of its most important functions is limiting the applicability of disclaimers of liability. The terms extend to ...

  4. File:Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UKPGA 1977-50).pdf

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Unfair_Contract_Terms...

    Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us

  5. Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfair_Terms_in_Consumer...

    It has been said the Regulations "sit atop the Act like an ill-fitting wig". [1] The 1994 Regulations were declared an insufficient implementation of the Directive, and had to be replaced by the 1999 Regulations; but once again, the opportunity to consolidate the law into an updated Unfair Contracts Terms Act was missed.

  6. Thornton v Shoe Lane Parking Ltd - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thornton_v_Shoe_Lane...

    In those cases the issue of the ticket was regarded as an offer by the company. If the customer took it and retained it without objection, his act was regarded as an acceptance of the offer: see Watkins v Rymill (1833) 10 QBD 178, 188 and Thompson v London, Midland and Scottish Railway Co [1930] 1 KB 41, 47. These cases were based on the theory ...

  7. Phillips Products Ltd v Hyland and Hamstead Plant Hire Co Ltd

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phillips_Products_Ltd_v...

    Condition 8 of their contract stated the driver would be deemed to be the employee of Phillips Products. The driver crashed into Phillips’ factory wall. Phillips argued that Hamstead Plant Hire should pay for the damage caused by Mr Hyland, because condition 8 was caught by UCTA 1977 section 2(2) and was unreasonable. Hamstead Plant Hire ...

  8. Johnstone v Bloomsbury HA - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Johnstone_v_Bloomsbury_HA

    He also held that the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA) s 2(1) would invalidate an 88-hour working week. He concluded saying that Bloomsbury Health Authority could only succeed if it showed the clause was an express assumption, or volenti, [clarification needed] but then it would still fall under UCTA 1977 through s 1(1). He finished by ...

  9. Unfair Contract Terms Bill - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unfair_Contract_Terms_Bill

    The Unfair Contract Terms Bill (Law Com 292) is a proposed Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom, which would consolidate two existing pieces of consumer protection legislation, the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 and the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999 into one Act. It would resolve existing ambiguities, and eliminate ...