enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Logical consequence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logical_consequence

    A valid logical argument is one in which the conclusion is entailed by the premises, because the conclusion is the consequence of the premises. The philosophical analysis of logical consequence involves the questions: In what sense does a conclusion follow from its premises? and What does it mean for a conclusion to be a consequence of premises ...

  3. Glossary of logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_logic

    An informal fallacy in which a conclusion is not logically justified by sufficient or unbiased evidence; drawing a general conclusion from a too-small sample size. Henkin semantics A generalization of standard first-order semantics that allows for models where the range of quantifiers can be restricted, named after Leon Henkin.

  4. Strawson entailment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strawson_entailment

    In formal semantics, Strawson entailment is a variant of the concept of entailment which is insensitive to presupposition failures. Formally, a sentence P Strawson-entails a sentence Q iff Q is always true when P is true and Qs presuppositions are satisfied. For example, "Maria loves every cat" Strawson-entails "Maria loves her cat" because ...

  5. Paradoxes of material implication - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradoxes_of_material...

    In natural language, an instance of the paradox of entailment arises: It is raining. And It is not raining. Therefore George Washington is made of rakes. This arises from the principle of explosion, a law of classical logic stating that inconsistent premises always make an argument valid; that is, inconsistent premises imply any conclusion at all.

  6. Conversation theory - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversation_theory

    The entailment structure is composed of a series of nodes and arrows representing a series of topic relations and the derivations of such topic relations. For example: In the above illustration, let T P Q ∈ { R i } {\displaystyle TPQ\in \{R_{i}\}} , such that there are topic relations that are members of a set of topic relations.

  7. Deductive reasoning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductive_reasoning

    Deductive reasoning is the psychological process of drawing deductive inferences.An inference is a set of premises together with a conclusion. This psychological process starts from the premises and reasons to a conclusion based on and supported by these premises.

  8. Your Cholesterol Could Be A Key Indicator Of Dementia. A ...

    www.aol.com/lifestyle/cholesterol-could-key...

    Typically, dementia is associated with classic symptoms like confusion and memory loss. But new research finds that there could be a less obvious risk factor out there: your cholesterol levels ...

  9. Informal logic - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Informal_logic

    Here validity is the focus: if the premises are true, the conclusion must then also be true. Now validity has to do with the logical form of the statement that makes up the argument. In this sense of formal, most modern and contemporary logic is formal. That is, such logics canonize the notion of logical form, and the notion of validity plays ...