Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Some other quantifiers sometimes used in mathematics include: There are infinitely many elements such that... For all but finitely many elements... (sometimes expressed as "for almost all elements..."). There are uncountably many elements such that... For all but countably many elements... For all elements in a set of positive measure...
In particular the logical depth of a graph is defined to be the minimum level of nesting of quantifiers (the quantifier rank) in a sentence defining the graph. [17] The sentence outlined above nests the quantifiers for all of its variables, so it has logical depth n + 1 {\displaystyle n+1} .
Bound variables within nested quantifiers are handled by increasing the subscript by one for each successive quantifier. This leads to rule 4, which must be applied after the other rules since rules 1 and 2 produce quantified variables.
In this logic, quantifiers may only be nested to finite depths, as in first-order logic, but formulas may have finite or countably infinite conjunctions and disjunctions within them. Thus, for example, it is possible to say that an object is a whole number using a formula of L ω 1 , ω {\displaystyle L_{\omega _{1},\omega }} such as
A graphical representation of a partially built propositional tableau. In proof theory, the semantic tableau [1] (/ t æ ˈ b l oʊ, ˈ t æ b l oʊ /; plural: tableaux), also called an analytic tableau, [2] truth tree, [1] or simply tree, [2] is a decision procedure for sentential and related logics, and a proof procedure for formulae of first-order logic. [1]
For example, the quantifier ∀ A, which can be viewed as set-theoretic inclusion, satisfies all of the above except [symmetry]. Clearly [symmetry] holds for ∃ A while e.g. [contraposition] fails. A semantic interpretation of conditional quantifiers involves a relation between sets of subsets of a given structure—i.e. a relation between ...
Translate the matrices of the most deeply nested quantifiers into disjunctive normal form, consisting of disjuncts of conjuncts of terms, negating atomic terms as required. The resulting subformula contains only negation, conjunction, disjunction, and existential quantification.
In mathematics and logic, a higher-order logic (abbreviated HOL) is a form of logic that is distinguished from first-order logic by additional quantifiers and, sometimes, stronger semantics. Higher-order logics with their standard semantics are more expressive, but their model-theoretic properties are less well-behaved than those of first-order ...