Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Although static_cast conversions are checked at compile time to prevent obvious incompatibilities, no run-time type checking is performed that would prevent a cast between incompatible data types, such as pointers. A static_cast from a pointer to a class B to a pointer to a derived class D is ill-formed if B is an inaccessible or ambiguous base ...
C++ also contains the type conversion operators const_cast, static_cast, dynamic_cast, and reinterpret_cast. The formatting of these operators means that their precedence level is unimportant. Most of the operators available in C and C++ are also available in other C-family languages such as C#, D, Java, Perl, and PHP with the same precedence ...
In computer science, type conversion, [1] [2] type casting, [1] [3] type coercion, [3] and type juggling [4] [5] are different ways of changing an expression from one data type to another. An example would be the conversion of an integer value into a floating point value or its textual representation as a string , and vice versa.
Safer casting operators, such as dynamic cast that performs run-time type checking. C++11 strongly-typed enumerations cannot be implicitly converted to or from integers or other enumeration types. C++ explicit constructors and C++11 explicit conversion operators prevent implicit type conversions.
It also supports a new group of typecasting operators to help catch some unintended dangerous casts at compile-time. Since C++11 , the C++ standard library also provides smart pointers ( unique_ptr , shared_ptr and weak_ptr ) which can be used in some situations as a safer alternative to primitive C pointers.
[4] [5] Function types in C++ are usually hidden behind typedefs and typically have an explicit reference or pointer qualifier. To force the alternate interpretation, the typical technique is a different object creation or conversion syntax. In the type conversion example, there are two alternate syntaxes available for casts: the "C-style cast"
In class-based programming, downcasting, or type refinement, is the act of casting a base or parent class reference, to a more restricted derived class reference. [1] This is only allowable if the object is already an instance of the derived class, and so this conversion is inherently fallible.
C++ is also more strict in conversions to enums: ints cannot be implicitly converted to enums as in C. Also, enumeration constants (enum enumerators) are always of type int in C, whereas they are distinct types in C++ and may have a size different from that of int. [needs update] In C++ a const variable must be initialized; in C this is not ...