Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The National Athletic Trainers’ Association Code of Ethics states the principles of ethical behavior that should be followed in the practice of athletic training. It is intended to establish and maintain professionalism for the athletic training profession. [3]
A code of practice is adopted by a profession (or by a governmental or non-governmental organization) to regulate that profession. A code of practice may be styled as a code of professional responsibility, which will discuss difficult issues and difficult decisions that will often need to be made, and then provide a clear account of what behavior is considered "ethical" or "correct" or "right ...
Brentwood Academy v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association, 531 U.S. 288 (2001), is a United States Supreme Court case concerning whether the actions of an interscholastic sport-association that regulated sports among Tennessee schools could be regarded as a state actor for First Amendment and Due Process purposes. [1]
The Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust (FACT), a conservative-leaning ethics watchdog, released a year-end round up of 2024's worst ethics violations committed by public officials that ...
The Sartell-St. Stephen School Board discussed consequences for board member code of ethics violations during its Oct. 9 work session. While the future policy isn’t set in stone yet, the idea of ...
The court, under pressure over claims of ethics violations mostly aimed at conservative justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, issued a new code last year but it was immediately criticized for ...
Three consecutive code violations. Received a warning for unsportsmanlike conduct after intimidating a lineswoman, a second warning for racquet abuse, and was disqualified after verbally abusing the chair umpire Gerry Armstrong. [4] 1995 French Open, France Carsten Arriens: Brett Steven: Hitting a linesman with a thrown racket. [5] 1995 ...
After a lengthy discussion with the House Clerk’s office, the committee chair announced that “there is no statement of interest violation, no code of ethics violation, or House Rules violation.”