enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pro se legal representation (/ ˌ p r oʊ ˈ s iː / or / ˌ p r oʊ ˈ s eɪ /) means to argue on one's own behalf in a legal proceeding, as a defendant or plaintiff in civil cases, or a defendant in criminal cases, rather than have representation from counsel or an attorney.

  3. List of U.S. state constitutional provisions allowing self ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._State...

    "The chief judge's directive at issue here clearly discriminates against pro se litigants solely on the basis of their pro se status and, in that respect, lacks any rational basis in fact and thus violates equal protection of the laws" [8] Colorado: Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct Canon III a 7

  4. Faretta v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faretta_v._California

    Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that criminal defendants have a constitutional right to refuse counsel and represent themselves in state criminal proceedings.

  5. Assistance of Counsel Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assistance_of_Counsel_Clause

    As stated in Brewer v.Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977), the right to counsel "means at least that a person is entitled to the help of a lawyer at or after the time that judicial proceedings have been initiated against him, 'whether by way of formal charge, preliminary hearing, indictment, information, or arraignment. ' " [2] Brewer goes on to conclude that once adversarial proceedings have begun ...

  6. Introducing The Posner Center of Justice for Pro Se’s - AOL

    www.aol.com/introducing-posner-center-justice...

    The Posner Center of Justice for Pro Se’s has a bold vision: to provide pro bono representation, but also to focus on assisting pro se litigants behind the scenes to help them to successfully ...

  7. List of United States Supreme Court cases involving ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Lester B. Orfield, A Resume of Decisions of the United States Supreme Court on Federal Criminal Procedure, 30 Ky. L.J. 360 (1942). Lester B. Orfield, A Resume of Decisions of the United States Supreme Court on Federal Criminal Procedure , 7 Mo. L. Rev. 263 (1942).

  8. Indiana v. Edwards - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indiana_v._Edwards

    The Court had recognized these two rights on competency for some time. In Dusky v.United States, 362 U.S. 402 (1960), and in Drope v. Missouri, 420 U.S. 162 (1975), the Court established the standard for competency to stand trial—the defendant must have a "rational and factual understanding" of the nature of the proceedings, and must be able to rationally assist his lawyer in defending him.

  9. AOL Mail

    mail.aol.com/?icid=aol.com-nav

    Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!