enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Reliability of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_Wikipedia

    Screenshot of Wiki-Watch rating of the article Reliability of Wikipedia rated as reliable source and additional orange WikiTrust marks for questionable edits. While experienced editors can view the article history and discussion page, for normal users it is not so easy to check whether information from Wikipedia is reliable.

  3. Wikipedia:What is a reliable source? - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_is_a...

    A reliable source is one that presents a well-reasoned theory or argument supported by strong evidence. Reliable sources include scholarly, peer-reviewed articles or books written by researchers for students and researchers, which can be found in academic databases and search engines like JSTOR and Google Scholar.

  4. Wikipedia:Reliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources

    Some news organizations have used Wikipedia articles as a source for their work. Editors should therefore beware of circular sourcing. [notes 3] Whether a specific news story is reliable for a fact or statement should be examined on a case-by-case basis. Multiple sources should not be asserted for any wire service article. Such sources are ...

  5. Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources/6 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/...

    Reddit is a social news and discussion website. Reddit contains mostly user-generated content, and is considered both self-published and generally unreliable. Interview responses written by verified interviewees on the r/IAmA subreddit are primary sources, and editors disagree on their reliability.

  6. Wikipedia:Why Wikipedia is so great - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Why_Wikipedia_is...

    To answer this question, some great people have written some explanations and arguments on this page. Everybody should use Wikipedia, either as a source or, if you find deficiencies, as a medium you can make contributions. For comparison, see also Wikipedia: Why Wikipedia is not so great, and Wikipedia: Replies to common objections. You can ...

  7. Wikipedia and fact-checking - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_and_fact-checking

    Wikipedia has a reputation for cultivating a culture of fact-checking among its editors. [16] Wikipedia's fact-checking process depends on the activity of its volunteer community of contributors, who numbered 200,000 as of 2018. [1] The development of fact-checking practices is ongoing in the Wikipedia editing community. [6]

  8. Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Potentially...

    All mainstream news media can make mistakes. Particularly with breaking news, corrections will need to be made and should be watched out for, and much tabloid journalism will be sensationalist and gossip-driven. Fact checking has reduced generally in the news media over recent years.

  9. Criticism of Wikipedia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Wikipedia

    This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 28 December 2024. Controversy surrounding the online encyclopedia Wikipedia This article relies excessively on references to primary sources. Please improve this article by adding secondary or tertiary sources. Find sources: "Criticism of Wikipedia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR ...