Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The alternative Super series, denoted SnR, nR Plus or nR+, has an aspect ratio of 3∶2 (or as close as possible) and thus provides a better fit for standard 135 film (35 mm) at sizes of 8 inches or above. 5R is twice the size of a 2R print, 6R twice the size of a 4R print and S8R twice the size of 6R. 4D/6D is a newer size for most consumer ...
107.95 × 165.1 mm No relation to the 126 cartridge format introduced in 1963. 126 ("Instamatic") cartridge 1963 2008 26.5 × 26.5 mm 12, 20 (later 24) 35 mm stock, registration perforated Introduced with first "Instamatic" cameras under the name "Kodapak" 127: roll film 1912 Present 1 + 5 ⁄ 8 × 2 + 1 ⁄ 2 in 1 + 5 ⁄ 8 × 1 + 5 ⁄ 8 in
unknown (amateur format) 28 mm 1.36 0.748" × 0.551" 3 perf, 2 sides spherical 28 mm spherical Clou (Austrian) 1920 unknown (amateur format) 17.5 mm 2 perf, 2 sides spherical 17.5 mm spherical 26 mm (French) 1920 unknown (amateur format) 26 mm 1 perf, 1 side spherical 26 mm spherical 9.5 mm: Pathé: 1922 unknown (amateur format) 9.5 mm 1.31
The 6 × 6 cm image size was the classic 1:1 format in the recent past. 120 film can still be found and used today. Many Polaroid instant films were designed as square formats. Furthermore, up until August 2015, photo-sharing site Instagram only allowed users to upload images in 1:1 format.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Additionally, under-tightened lug nuts may come loose with time. The tool size needed for removal and installation depends on the type of lug nut. The three most common hex sizes for lug nuts are 17 mm, 19 mm, and 21 mm, while 22 mm, 23 mm, 11 ⁄ 16 inch (17.5 mm), and 13 ⁄ 16 inch (20.6 mm) are less commonly used.
#1 Louisville (28-5) 21-12 ATS 10-0 L10 8.1 3PT High Scorers: Clark 14.9, Williams 12.3, Samuels 11.9
Don't rely on bloviating pundits to tell you who'll prevail on Hollywood's big night. The Huffington Post crunched the stats on every Oscar nominee of the past 30 years to produce a scientific metric for predicting the winners at the 2013 Academy Awards.