Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
[2] Under the "substantial evidence" standard, appellate review extends to whether there is any relevant evidence in the record which reasonably supports every material fact (that is, material in the sense of establishing an essential element of a claim or defense). Appellate courts will not reverse such findings of fact unless they have no ...
Bowen, 823 F.2d 273, 275 (8th Cir. 1987) (“the substantial justification standard is a lesser standard than the substantial evidence standard used to review administrative determinations”) (citations omitted).
APA standards of review; PTO fact-finding gets "substantial evidence" standard on review Florida Prepaid v. College Savings Bank: 527 U.S. 627: 1999: Unconstitutional for Congress to eliminate states' 11th Amendment sovereign immunity against patent infringements.
Universal Camera has been "the leading case on the meaning of the APA's 'substantial evidence' test for review of agency factual conclusions in formal proceedings" for over sixty years. [8] Commentators have noted that the substantial evidence test, as determined by Universal Camera , is "less deferential than the jury standard but more ...
Special counsel Jack Smith this week will be allowed to file hundreds of pages of legal arguments and evidence gathered in the 2020 election subversion and January 6 US Capitol attack criminal ...
To set aside formal rulemaking or formal adjudication for which procedures are trial-like, [18] a different standard of review allows courts to question agency actions more strongly. For such more formal actions, agency decisions must be supported by "substantial evidence" [ 19 ] after the court reads the "whole record," [ 19 ] which can be ...
[3] [4] Judicial review, as noted in the statute relates, "The findings of the Secretary as to any fact, if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive . . . ." Perales was a truck driver who was injured on the job. Pedro Perales had claimed he had received a back injury by lifting an object at work.
Rational basis review is not a genuine effort to determine the legislature's actual reasons for enacting a statute, nor to inquire into whether a statute does in fact further a legitimate end of government. A court applying rational basis review will virtually always uphold a challenged law unless every conceivable justification for it is a ...