enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Wikipedia : Identifying and using self-published works

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_and...

    A self-published source can be independent, authoritative, high-quality, accurate, fact-checked, and expert-approved. Self-published sources can be reliable, and they can be used (but not for third-party claims about living people). Sometimes, a self-published source is even the best possible source or among the best sources. For example:

  3. Wikipedia:Verifiability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability

    Self-published and questionable sources may be used as sources of information about themselves, usually in articles about themselves or their activities, without the self-published source requirement that they are established experts in the field, so long as: The material is neither unduly self-serving nor an exceptional claim;

  4. Wikipedia : Template index/Cleanup/Verifiability and sources

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Verifiability_and_sources

    This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification, as its only attribution is to self-published sources; articles should not be based solely on such sources. Please help by adding reliable, independent sources .

  5. Wikipedia:WikiProject Reliability - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject...

    Affirm sources that have a reputation for accuracy, fact-checking, and error-correction; Challenge questionable sources, including self-published sources authored by non-experts, sponsored content, and spam; Maintain the list of perennial sources. Add perennial sources that are missing from the page

  6. Wikipedia:Template index/Sources of articles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/.../Sources_of_articles

    This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification, as its only attribution is to self-published sources; articles should not be based solely on such sources. Please help by adding reliable, independent sources .

  7. Wikipedia : Verifiability/Draft

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability/Draft

    For that reason, self-published media, such as books, patents, newsletters, personal websites, open wikis, personal or group blogs, Internet forum postings, and tweets, are largely not acceptable as sources. Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established expert on the topic of the article whose work in ...

  8. Wikipedia talk:Identifying and using self-published works

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Identifying...

    This has been incorrectly transformed into an "always" statement in the new ===Unacceptable=== section: "A non-self-published source that verifies the same information is available. These are always preferable." Non-self-published sources are not always preferable. Sometimes the original is the authoritative and therefore best possible source.

  9. Wikipedia:Applying reliability guidelines - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Applying...

    Self-publishing denotes a complete lack of editorial gate-keeping, not only a lack of gate-keeping by a web hosting platform. Reliable content could be uploaded anywhere. Most reliable sourcing guidelines are subject to consensus, but one firm rule is that self-published sources can never be used for claims about living people except about the ...