Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979), was a Supreme Court case holding that the installation and use of a pen register by the police to obtain information on a suspect's telephone calls was not a "search" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, and hence no search warrant was required.
Exxon Corp. v. Governor of Maryland, 437 U.S. 117 (1978), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States upheld a Maryland law prohibiting oil producers and refiners from operating service stations within its borders. [1] The challengers, including Exxon, claimed that the law violated the Dormant Commerce Clause.
Smith v. Cain, 565 U.S. 73, 132 S. Ct. 627 (2012), is a United States Supreme Court decision clarifying the Brady v. Maryland standard for criminal discovery. [1]
Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Mfg., 545 U.S. 308 (2005), was a United States Supreme Court decision [1] involving the jurisdiction of the federal district courts under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question jurisdiction).
Smith v. United States; Smith v. United States; Smith v. United States, 431 U.S. 291 (1977), a case about federal obscenity prosecutions; Smith v. United States, 508 U.S. 223 (1993), a case about exchanging guns for drugs; Smith v. United States, 568 U.S. 106 (2013), a case about members leaving a drug conspiracy group; Smith v.
Maryland v. Wilson , 519 U.S. 408 (1997), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States . The Court held that officers could order passengers out a car during a traffic stop, extending Pennsylvania v.
Smith v. Van Gorkom 488 A.2d 858 (Del. 1985) [1] is a United States corporate law case of the Delaware Supreme Court, discussing a director's duty of care.
United States v. Grubbs, 547 U.S. 90 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the constitutionality of "anticipatory" search warrants under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled that such warrants, which are issued in advance of a "triggering condition" that makes them ...