Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
It is often simply referred to as “Act 425” and contractual agreements entered into pursuant to this statute are frequently called 425 Agreements. The purpose of Act 425 is to provide for a means for two local units of government to share tax revenues resulting from new or expanding development in the areas of their jurisdiction .
The Competition in Contracting Act (CICA) of 1984, 41 U.S.C. 253, is United States legislation governing the hiring of contractors. It requires U.S. federal government agencies to arrange “full and open competition through the use of competitive procedures” in their procurement activities unless otherwise authorized by law. [ 1 ]
The general purpose of Cable Communications Act of 1984 was to define jurisdictional boundaries for regulating cable television systems among federal, state and local authorities. [2] After 1984 Act had been enacted, the failure to balance the unequal growth within provider and subscriber has become problematic.
The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 98-417), informally known as the Hatch-Waxman Act, is a 1984 United States federal law that established the modern system of generic drug regulation in the United States.
Related: 300 Trivia Questions and Answers to Jumpstart Your Fun Game Night Ready for the answers? Scroll below this image (the image that represents your very appreciated patience !).
Brittany Mahomes is stepping up her WAG style in support of Patrick Mahomes!. At the Dec. 8, Kansas City Chiefs game against the Los Angeles Chargers at Arrowhead Stadium in Kansas City, Mo., the ...
An errant social media post from Trump was sufficient to move the conversation of the entire primary field, and most of the Trump-free debates still started with questions about his campaign.
United States v. Miller, 425 U.S. 435 (1976), was a United States Supreme Court that held that bank records are not subject to protection under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [1] The case, along with Smith v. Maryland, established the principle of the third-party doctrine in relation to privacy rights.