Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The Parker immunity doctrine is an exemption from liability for engaging in antitrust violations. It applies to the state when it exercises legislative authority in creating a regulation with anticompetitive effects, and to private actors when they act at the direction of the state after it has done so.
Virginia State Bar (1975) found Parker immunity required what Justice Kennedy calls “more than a mere facade of state involvement”. Because the Sherman Act was designed to break private monopolies, [6] Justice Kennedy does not accept that the "congressional judgment" was to allow the States to delegate their immunity to a private monopoly. [7]
Parker v. Brown , 317 U.S. 341 (1943), was a United States Supreme Court case on the scope of United States antitrust law . It held that actions taken by state governments were exempt from the scope of the Sherman Act .
California Retail Liquor Dealers Assn. v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc., 445 U.S. 97 (1980), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court created a two-part test for the application of the state action immunity doctrine that it had previously developed in Parker v.
With U.S. cities in turmoil over the death of George Floyd, a lawmaker plans to introduce a legislation to eliminate a legal doctrine protecting police. U.S. lawmaker readies bill aimed at ending ...
The legal doctrine of qualified immunity contributes to the erosion of public confidence in policing and makes us all less safe.. As it stands, if unlawful or unconstitutional action by a ...
The top decisions by the Supreme Court of 2024 covered presidential immunity for President-elect Trump, transgender protections, Chevron doctrine and more.
Parker immunity doctrine This page was last edited on 20 March 2012, at 05:40 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 ...