enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_Adjutant_General's...

    Ohio Adjutant General's Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 598 U.S. ___ (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Federal Labor Relations Authority had jurisdiction over a state National Guard labor dispute because a state National Guard acts as a federal agency for the purpose of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute when it ...

  3. Category:2023 in United States case law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:2023_in_United...

    Lists of 2023 term United States Supreme Court opinions (14 P) Pages in category "2023 in United States case law" The following 86 pages are in this category, out of 86 total.

  4. National Federation of Independent Business v. Occupational ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Federation_of...

    National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 595 U.S. ___ (2022), is a Supreme Court of the United States case before the Court on an application for a stay of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's COVID-19 vaccination or test mandate. On January 13, 2022, the ...

  5. Ohio Department of Job and Family Services - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ohio_Department_of_Job_and...

    This information is used by ODJFS and Ohio’s local employment program operators, as well as by the Ohio Departments of Education and Development, the Ohio Board of Regents, state and national media, private citizens and industry groups. The LMI website drew nearly 1.5 million page views in SFY 2012. [2]

  6. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burlington_Industries,_Inc...

    Laws applied Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth , 524 U.S. 742 (1998), is a landmark employment law case of the United States Supreme Court holding that employers are liable if supervisors create a hostile work environment for employees. [ 1 ]

  7. Ragsdale v. Wolverine World Wide, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ragsdale_v._Wolverine...

    Case history; Prior: 218 F.3d 933 (8th Cir. 2000); cert. granted, 533 U.S. 928 (2001). Holding; 29 CFR 825.700(a) is contrary to the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 and beyond authority of the Secretary of Labor. United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reverse and remanded. Court membership; Chief Justice William Rehnquist ...

  8. IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBP,_Inc._v._Alvarez

    Laws applied Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez , 546 U.S. 21 (2005), is a US labor law case of the a United States Supreme Court , interpreting the Federal Labor Standards Act (FLSA) of 1938, as amended by the Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947.

  9. NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NLRB_v._J._Weingarten,_Inc.

    NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 420 U.S. 251 (1975), is a United States labor law case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.It held that employees in unionized workplaces have the right under the National Labor Relations Act to the presence of a union steward during any management inquiry that the employee reasonably believes may result in discipline.