Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In 2015 Chandra lost a $132 million case against the CBC, which in 2006 presented a documentary in which 10 of Chandra's publications were identified as "fraudulent or highly suspicious"; [32] Chandra was ordered to pay the CBC $1.6 million to cover the defendant's legal fees. [33]
Colin Diver, former president of Reed College writes that an "Honor Principle" must be the basis of a culture of academic integrity. [69] Some professors defended the take-home exam format. [70] Erika Christakis and Nicholas A. Christakis write that there is a "national crisis of academic dishonesty." [71] Harry R. Lewis entreats Harvard to ...
On October 13, 2017, the NCAA announced it would not levy penalties against North Carolina, saying it "could not conclude that the University of North Carolina violated N.C.A.A. academic rules." [64] [65] [66] In their defense, North Carolina cited cases where Auburn and Michigan had similar misconduct and the NCAA did not act. [64]
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
Academic dishonesty, academic misconduct, academic fraud and academic integrity are related concepts that refer to various actions on the part of students that go against the expected norms of a school, university or other learning institution. Definitions of academic misconduct are usually outlined in institutional policies.
A reconstruction of the skull purportedly belonging to the Piltdown Man, a long-lasting case of scientific misconduct. Scientific misconduct is the violation of the standard codes of scholarly conduct and ethical behavior in the publication of professional scientific research.
The scandal provoked discussion in the scientific community about the degree of responsibility which coauthors and reviewers of scientific articles bear in cases of scientific misbehavior. The discussion mainly concerned whether peer review , traditionally designed to find errors and determine relevance and originality of articles, should also ...
Professor Volker Rieble approved the report of the university but saw the case as an expression of the public desire for "ritual punishment". Rieble decried the widespread practice of academic publications being written by assistants but published by professors as much worse for academia than any plagiarism. [184]