Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The terms of reference given to the Commission stated that it shall examine, in the light of the experience of the past fifty years, as to how best the Constitution can respond to the changing needs of efficient, smooth and effective system of governance and socio-economic development of modern India within the framework of parliamentary democracy, and to recommend changes, if any, that are ...
Download as PDF; Printable version; In other projects Wikidata item; Appearance. ... Laxmikant Sharma (24 January 1960– May 31, 2021) was an Indian politician.
Politics of India works within the framework of the country's Constitution. India is a parliamentary secular democratic republic in which the president of India is the head of state & first citizen of India and the Prime Minister of India is the head of government. It is based on the federal structure of government, although the word is not ...
Lakshmi Kant Jha was born into a Maithil Brahmin family in Darbhanga, Bihar. [3] He was a member of the 1936 batch of the Indian Civil Service.He was educated at Benares Hindu University (BHU), Trinity College, Cambridge, and the London School of Economics.
Laxmikant Yashwant Parsekar (born 4 July 1956) is an Indian politician who served as the Chief Minister of Goa, from 2014 to 2017. He was the member of the Goa Legislative Assembly from Mandrem constituency, and he belonged to the Bharatiya Janata Party. He is currently an Independent politician. [1] [2]
A classic example of a constitutional body is the Election Commission of India, which is created to conduct and regulate the national and state elections in India. A Constitutional body has either complete independence or functional independence when discharging their constitutional obligations.
Lakshmikant Mandal is an Indian politician in Janata Dal (United). He was elected as a member of the Bihar Legislative Assembly from Nathnagar on 24 October 2019. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ]
The jury trials were abolished in India in the early 1960s, after the famous case KM Nanavati v. the State of Maharashtra, for reasons of being vulnerable to media and public pressure, as well as to being misled. Unlike its United States counterpart, the Indian justice system consists of a unitary system at both state and union levels.