Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Since the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), there have been numerous actions in federal courts to challenge the constitutionality of the legislation. [1] [2] They include challenges by states against the ACA, reactions from legal experts with respect to its constitutionality, several federal court rulings on the ACA's constitutionality, the final ruling on the constitutionality of the ...
301 U.S. 1 (1937) Hughes 5-4 none McReynolds (opinion, found at 301 U.S. 76; joined by VanDevanter, Sutherland, and Butler) certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (5th Cir.) decree judgment affirmed reversed, and cause remanded National Labor Relations Board v. Fruehauf Trailer Company: 301 U.S. 49 (1937) Hughes ...
The chief architects of the lawsuit were Florida International University law professor Elizabeth Price Foley and lawyer David B. Rivkin. [4] [5] The lawsuit was authorized to challenge the actions by the President or other executive branch officials inconsistent with their duties under the Constitution, under Article II, section 3 of the Constitution, to "take care that the laws be faithfully ...
Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 584 U.S. ___ (2018), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on how two federal laws, the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) and the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA), relate to whether employment contracts can legally bar employees from collective arbitration.
Joyce Bell Limbrick was the highest-ranking female and Black official in USC's athletic administration. But in a lawsuit, Bell Limbrick says that her once-promising career was irreparably changed.
(The Center Square) – The Silent Majority Foundation has filed a lawsuit against state Attorney General Bob Ferguson and his office on behalf of 10 former AGO employees who lost their jobs over ...
On August 10, 1988, the Third Circuit vacated the district court's dismissal of the class complaint and remanded the case to district court. [3] In doing this, the Third Circuit found that SSA's interpretation of "comparable severity" was too restrictive and preclusive of an individualized assessment of children's functional impairments.
Attorneys filed an amended complaint in Tampa federal court Tuesday.