Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The outcome of the sprint is a functional deliverable, or a product which has received some development in increments. When a sprint is abnormally terminated, the next step is to conduct new sprint planning, where the reason for the termination is reviewed. Each sprint starts with a sprint planning event in which a sprint goal is defined.
The concept sprint is a fast five-day process for cross-functional teams to brainstorm, define, and model new approaches to business issue. [ 10 ] [ 11 ] Another common variant is the Service Design Sprint , an approach to Design Sprints created in 2014 that uses Service Design tools and mechanics to tackle service innovation.
A typical length for a sprint is less than 30 days. [18] [19] Sprint planning, sprint retrospective and sprint review meetings are timeboxed. [18] In Extreme programming methodologies, development planning is timeboxed into iterations typically 1, 2 or 3 weeks in length. The business revalues pending user stories before each iteration. [20]
Planning poker, also called Scrum poker, is a consensus-based, gamified technique for estimating, mostly used for timeboxing in Agile principles. In planning poker, members of the group make estimates by playing numbered cards face-down to the table, instead of speaking them aloud. The cards are revealed, and the estimates are then discussed.
PDCA (plan–do–check–act or plan–do–check–adjust) is an iterative design and management method used in business for the control and continual improvement of processes and products. Planning in organizations and public policy is both the organizational process of creating and maintaining a plan; and the psychological process of ...
Scrum has daily meetings (the daily scrum) for the team to reflect and assess progress towards the sprint goal. [8] This meeting is intended to be brief – less than 15 minutes – so any in-depth discussions about impediments are deferred until after the event is complete.
The scaled agile framework (SAFe) is a set of organization and workflow patterns intended to guide enterprises in scaling lean and agile practices. [1] [2] Along with disciplined agile delivery (DAD) and S@S (Scrum@Scale), SAFe is one of a growing number of frameworks that seek to address the problems encountered when scaling beyond a single team.
Rolling-wave planning is the process of project planning in waves as the project proceeds and later details become clearer; similar to the techniques used in agile software development approaches like Scrum. [1] Work to be done in the near term is based on high-level assumptions; also, high-level milestones are set.