Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A discussion moderator or debate moderator is a person whose role is to act as a neutral participant in a debate or discussion, holds participants to time limits and tries to keep them from straying off the topic of the questions being raised in the debate. Sometimes moderators may ask questions intended to allow the debate participants to ...
International English Language Testing System (IELTS / ˈ aɪ. ɛ l t s /) [6] is an international standardized test of English language proficiency for non-native English language speakers. It is jointly managed by the British Council, IDP and Cambridge English, [6] and was established in 1989. IELTS is one of the major English-language tests ...
The Teahouse is a friendly space for new editors to ask questions with answers from experienced editors. The help desk is the main place for asking questions and also where to turn when all else fails. The village pump is the forum for discussion of Wikipedia's more complex project-wide technical issues, policies, proposals, and operations.
Help desk — the volunteers here will help you with Wikipedia-related questions. Wikipedia:Questions — another help page Wikipedia:Teahouse — friendly place for new editors to become accustomed to Wikipedia culture, ask questions, and develop community relationships. Wikipedia:Village pump (technical) — the place to ask technical ...
Except in a section for back-and-forth discussion, replies to other editors or back-and-forth discussion may be collapsed by the moderator and may result in a rebuke. It is the responsibility of every participant to keep the moderator informed as to whether they will take any wikibreaks or be absent due to real life. Every participant is ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
As with consulting the article history, looking at the talk page gives you a behind-the-scenes look at the formation of the article.If aspects of it are controversial or disputed; if there has been question over its appropriate scope; if there has been a serious disagreement over sources, balance, or point-of-view issues; you will probably find it there.
It is solely for discussing whether a consensus can be discerned in a discussion, and how the discussion should be closed on the basis of a finding of consensus, or of an absence of consensus. Editors who are involved in discussions of the merits should generally avoid engaging in extensive discussion of how consensus in those discussions ...