enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Ergative–absolutive alignment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergative–absolutive...

    In linguistic typology, ergative–absolutive alignment is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the single argument ("subject") of an intransitive verb behaves like the object of a transitive verb, and differently from the agent ("subject") of a transitive verb. [1]

  3. Split ergativity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Split_ergativity

    In intransitive clauses, the subject can either be represented by a set A-person marker, or a set B-person marker, depending on aspect. In perfective aspect, Chol has ergative–absolutive alignment: the subject of the intransitive verb is expressed by a suffixed person marker, thus in the same way as the object of transitive verbs.

  4. Ergative case - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergative_case

    Sahaptin has an ergative noun case (with suffix -nɨm) that is limited to transitive constructions only when the direct object is 1st or 2nd person: iwapáatayaaš łmámanɨm ‘the old woman helped me’; paanáy iwapáataya łmáma ‘the old woman helped him/her’ (direct); páwapaataya łmámayin ‘the old woman helped him/her’ (inverse).

  5. Ergative - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ergative

    Ergative case, the grammatical case of the subject of a transitive verb in an ergative-absolutive language; Ergative–absolutive language, a language in which the subject of an intransitive verb behaves like the object of a transitive verb; Ergative verb, a verb whose subject when intransitive corresponds to its direct object when transitive

  6. Active–stative alignment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Active–stative_alignment

    In linguistic typology, active–stative alignment (also split intransitive alignment or semantic alignment) is a type of morphosyntactic alignment in which the sole argument ("subject") of an intransitive clause (often symbolized as S) is sometimes marked in the same way as an agent of a transitive verb (that is, like a subject such as "I" or "she" in English) but other times in the same way ...

  7. Glossary of biology - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glossary_of_biology

    This glossary of biology terms is a list of definitions of fundamental terms and concepts used in biology, the study of life and of living organisms.It is intended as introductory material for novices; for more specific and technical definitions from sub-disciplines and related fields, see Glossary of cell biology, Glossary of genetics, Glossary of evolutionary biology, Glossary of ecology ...

  8. Word order - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Word_order

    However, they are ergative–absolutive languages, and the more specific word order is intransitive VS, transitive VOA (Verb-Object-Absolutive), where the S and O arguments both trigger the same type of agreement on the verb. Indeed, many languages that some thought had a VOS (Verb-Object-Subject) word order turn out to be ergative like Mayan.

  9. Labile verb - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labile_verb

    In general linguistics, a labile verb (or ergative verb) is a verb that undergoes causative alternation; that is, it can be used both transitively and intransitively, with the requirement that the direct object of its transitive use corresponds to the subject of its intransitive use, [1] as in "I ring the bell" and "The bell rings."