Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Frustration of purpose, in law, is a defense to enforcement of a contract.Frustration of purpose occurs when an unforeseen event undermines a party's principal purpose for entering into a contract such that the performance of the contract is radically different from performance of the contract that was originally contemplated by both parties, and both parties knew of the principal purpose at ...
Frustration Krell v Henry [ 1 ] [1903] 2 KB 740 is an English case which sets forth the doctrine of frustration of purpose in contract law . It is one of a group of cases, known as the " coronation cases ", which arose from events surrounding the coronation of Edward VII and Alexandra in 1902.
The contract was ruled to be void, not under the doctrine of frustration of purpose as in other Coronation cases, but on the grounds of mistake. The crucial difference is that, unlike the other coronation cases where a later event made the contract fundamentally different, in this case the parties entered into the contract under the mistaken ...
Frustration is an English contract law doctrine that acts as a device to set aside contracts where an unforeseen event either renders contractual obligations impossible, or radically changes the party's principal purpose for entering into the contract.
Frustration Herne Bay Steamboat Co v Hutton [1903] 2 KB 683 is a case on the subject of frustration of purpose . It is one of a group of cases arising out of the same event, known as the coronation cases .
The doctrine of impracticability in the common law of contracts excuses performance of a duty, where the said duty has become unfeasibly difficult or expensive for the party who was to perform.
Republicans are expressing frustration about controversial remarks made at former President Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally, worrying it could complicate the party’s outreach to Hispanic ...
frustration of purpose, foreseeable or self-induced frustration Maritime National Fish Ltd v Ocean Trawlers Ltd [1935] UKPC 1 , [ 1 ] is a case on the subject of frustration of purpose , specifically establishing that foreseeable or self-induced frustration will not render a contract frustrated.